egafd.com

you can only publish images with a release signed thats what its for. the photographer retains copyright but thats a different thing to publishing rights without a release content cant be published and samsung claims thats wrong when its not.

samsung the reason I am many UK sites carry a 2257 statement is due to processing, if you are using any 3rd party processors such as epoch or ccbill you will never get your site accepted without a statement.

hi tony and thanks for the compliment I dont require any fax bud I was only asking you to confirm, you know what models are like with telling those little white lies lol. The sites content is everything from topless right up to BG scenes.

Her name is Lilly not Jessica her paysite with TDF Cash has just gone live www.lilly-exposed.com , according to her you dont have the right to publish those images as she didnt sign a release is this correct?