In search of yesteryear

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
Post Reply
Advocate
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

In search of yesteryear

Post by Advocate »

Hello all. I am new to this forum, so I may be bringing up a topic that has already been exhaustively discussed, but I would be very grateful for any constructive suggestions. Specifically, I despise the current trend in XXX actresses toward body piercing, tattoos, implants, and pubic shaving; in short, I pine for the look of 1970's-early 1980's, you know, Mayfair and all that. For me, the shining example of such an actress/model, and one who actually was working later than the aforesaid period, is Lynn Smith (see URL below). What I am wondering is, are there any hardcore actresses out there who still embody that all-natural look? I suspect not, but as I say any and all suggestions to the contrary would be very welcome. Thanks all!!!

Advocate

joe king
Posts: 6789
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: In search of yesteryear

Post by joe king »

'piercing, tattoos, implants, and pubic shaving'

' that all-natural look'

Piercing is not natural.
Tattoos are not natural.
Implants are not natural.
Pubic shaving is not natural.

I wonder if washing your hair in a variety of chemical agents tested on little furry bunnies is 'natural'.
Nature is not 'natural', it's a man-made construct. Man, tames, rearranges and generally shapes nature to his own purpose.

So what's so natural about 'natural?
Piercing,tattoos, implants, pubic shaving and the lack of them makes someone a 'natural'? I notice you didn't mention make-up. 'Natural-look' make-up is still make-up. Maybe you like the freckled, spotty, red-patched look.

~~~~~joe king~~~~~
Free pics and movie links of British porn stars
Latest British porn links: [b][url]http://british-uk-porn.com/blog/[/url][/b]
Advocate
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: In search of yesteryear

Post by Advocate »

Well, "Joe," that's all fine for a coffee-house debate, but you know perfectly well what I meant by "natural," and you of all people should know better than to make such facile, specious arguments, since your own sites feature a number of women with exactly the look I'm referring to. I had specifically asked for constructive suggestions, not smart-ass wise-guy remarks. So if you can't do any better than that, please don't respond at all.
NeilUK
Posts: 1810
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: In search of yesteryear

Post by NeilUK »

Why does almost every thread in the forum end up in arguments. Personally speaking I can find women attractive whether or not they have implants or not. I am not a huge fan of tattoes but there have been women I have fancied who have them. Perfect example being Delta from babestation tv. There surely isn't a golden rule and if someone rejects a girl or doesnt buy a film because she has something that she wasn't born with, I find that quite sad.


NeilUK
http://www.celebritiesrus.com/blog
Deuce Bigolo
Posts: 9910
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: In search of yesteryear

Post by Deuce Bigolo »

You'd be hard pressed...maybe a look thorugh the will turn up someone but I wouldn't count on it

Your best bet is to just stick with the porn from that era

A search under 'seventies porn' or retro porn will turn up links to
retailers that still sell older stuff

The mods are always posting links to such stuff

Then theres Ace who seems to own most of the seventies titles
if you do a search you'll find his email addy

cheers
B....OZ
joe king
Posts: 6789
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: In search of yesteryear

Post by joe king »

'but you know perfectly well what I meant by "natural'
Maybe I didn't. So when you say 'natural' you mean no tattoos, no piercings, plenty of bush. Do you like underarm hair?


this site contains pubic hair


hirsute lovers







~~~~~joe king~~~~~
Free pics and movie links of British porn stars
Latest British porn links: [b][url]http://british-uk-porn.com/blog/[/url][/b]
joe king
Posts: 6789
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: In search of yesteryear

Post by joe king »

Nicole Peters - and she's appeared in films




~~~~~joe king~~~~~
Free pics and movie links of British porn stars
Latest British porn links: [b][url]http://british-uk-porn.com/blog/[/url][/b]
Advocate
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: In search of yesteryear

Post by Advocate »

Thank you to all, and my apologies to "Joe'" if my response to your first e-mail was a bit snippy. I guess I am just a bit frustrated because what I am ideally searching for is a rather improbable scenario: actresses typical of the 1970's era (no implants, piercing, tattoos-- and with a natural bush though no leg or underarm hair) performing the kind of ultrahard action seen in today's gonzo-type films. Alas, although there are some actresses in Scoreland (e.g. Ms. Peters, Kerry Marie) who fit the bill physically, they tend towards softcore or rather weak hardcore, probably because their films center pretty exclusively around the big-breast theme. And of course Lynn Smith, who I initially referred to as my ideal, never did any hardcore (at least to my knowledge).

If anyone should know of any videos from the 1970-80's which can match the sheer "nastiness" of the modern stuff, or a modern film of this caliber which features actresses tending towards the look I've described above, I'd love to hear about them. I am familiar with U.S.-made films of the "Golden Era" (circa 1975-1985) and modern times, but I am almost totally unfamiliar with British films of this period, and only slightly more knowledgeable about present-day British productions, being a colonial from across the herring pond and all that. So, if any of my British forum companions can make any specific suggestions in this context, they are most welcome.

BTW Joe, I really like the thumbnails from the '70's featured on your sites---are the films they are from actually available for purchase? Of course there are problems what with the PAL/NTSC incompatibility factor, but perhaps these could be overcome.

Thanks again, all.
Post Reply