DOESN'T HAVE TO BE HARDCORE

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
videokim
Posts: 2985
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: DOESN'T HAVE TO BE HARDCORE

Post by videokim »

Hi

We agree soft is as nice as hard & easier to sell, we meet a big busted lady the other day as you do & asked her if she was up for g-g or b-g.
She said no because she is only a photo model etc so now were going to do a bathroom scene of her undressing, soaping those huge boobs, drying herself & a bit of posing for the video which will be every bit as horny as an hardcore scene.
Its a bit like i said on here the other day that weve gone so hardcore that we need to turn around & start again from basics as there is a market for old retro films & also films like Color Climax which are good for download etc.

Kim

Kims Amateurs The original & still the best UK amateurs...often imitated never equalled

https://twitter.com/bustykim
https://twitter.com/kimsamateurs
[email]videokim69@hotmail.com[/email]
[email]videokim69@gmail
randyandy
Posts: 2480
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: DOESN'T HAVE TO BE HARDCORE

Post by randyandy »

Cheers Terry

You've done some excellent stuff especially with Gerogette Neal unfortunately the only scenes I have seen with her are from the Celebrity Shags series. Good but very quickly to the point (if you know what I mean lol) Have to say the one in the house with the old bloke and his budgie was great.

Michelle Thorne in her little dress when her bike gets a puncture is another classic but my all time favourite is with the wonderful Laura Turner.

It's the one were she is on a bed painting the toes of another beauty before the best Lesbian session I have ever had the pleasure to watch takes place!

You've done so many great things with Laura, who can forget the hot summers day on her flats roof, but the scene with her and Sabrina was just fantastic and does it for me every time.

dedra
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: DOESN'T HAVE TO BE HARDCORE

Post by dedra »

Ok i'll let u off this time but don't let it happen again. I sound like Mrs Brian in Life Of Brian (he's been a very naughtyboy)
Deuce Bigolo
Posts: 9910
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: DOESN'T HAVE TO BE HARDCORE

Post by Deuce Bigolo »

Water under the bridge Mate

If memory serves me correctly it wasn't the Virus that was off topic but the 2 Ts which alas I always manage to include in any email that wasn't technically minded

I'm sure those Chinese that only come up to your knees are lurking outside
watching & waiting

As for arousing softcore,anything that shows off the female body without showing penetration would cover it

The ones that really arouse are the girls/women that havea prescence ie Charmaine Sinclair....her hardcore scenes compared to her softcore are almost forgetable(only because hardcut 3 had Claire Green in the scene-watching)


cheers
B....OZ
planeterotica
Posts: 7093
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: DOESN'T HAVE TO BE HARDCORE

Post by planeterotica »

I agree that softcore can often be more of a turn on than hardcore but its taken years to get R18 accepted in the U.K. and most of the punters would not wish to go back to the old censored versions, but seeing attractive girls displaying their wares in public places will always sell even if there is no sexual content other than nudity, i doubt if things will do a turnaround and go back to the Harrison Marks type films of the 60s when the only way he could get them past the censors was by calling them Naturist films plenty of nudity but no sex there use to be long queues at the flicks when these were being screened. But any porno film with even a flimsy story line is more interesting than just watching people bonking.

Post Reply