Site (and front page!!!) just updated
-
alec
Site (and front page!!!) just updated
The site has just been updated with a new front page and lots more entries. Please check out the new entries via History and Summary - preferably before you get bogged down in commenting on the new front page. As always any corrections and additions eagerly sought.
-
joe king
Re: Site (and front page!!!) just updated
logo of text looks split in half- not matching 'afd' with bg very well (or was that the intention)? I thought we were going to have pics of wendy, layla and rj (can just see rj). Chanta in deep blue!
Shelagh Harrison I think was called Sharron Harrison in the Electric Blue Videos.
Shelagh Harrison I think was called Sharron Harrison in the Electric Blue Videos.
-
alec
Re: Site (and front page!!!) just updated
joe king wrote:
>
> logo of text looks split in half- not matching 'afd' with bg
> very well (or was that the intention)? I thought we were
> going to have pics of wendy, layla and rj (can just see rj).
> Chanta in deep blue!
Have you hit refresh?
>
> Shelagh Harrison I think was called Sharron Harrison in the
> Electric Blue Videos.
I wouldn't be surprised. Thanks.
>
> logo of text looks split in half- not matching 'afd' with bg
> very well (or was that the intention)? I thought we were
> going to have pics of wendy, layla and rj (can just see rj).
> Chanta in deep blue!
Have you hit refresh?
>
> Shelagh Harrison I think was called Sharron Harrison in the
> Electric Blue Videos.
I wouldn't be surprised. Thanks.
-
eager beaver
Re: front page, just updated
give us a clue, what site are you referring to, please?
-
hmmm
Re: front page, just updated
i realise no-one lingers on 1st page anyway but can't help feeling a crisper,cleaner approach might have had more impact.
rather than run the risk of "why isn't she on there" or "who are they" etc etc why not a complete departure.
why not just a much brighter "BGAFD" with a stylish graphic.
that sort of washed photo montage means you could be in any one
of a thousand other sites.
the site desrves a bit better than that frankly.
rather than run the risk of "why isn't she on there" or "who are they" etc etc why not a complete departure.
why not just a much brighter "BGAFD" with a stylish graphic.
that sort of washed photo montage means you could be in any one
of a thousand other sites.
the site desrves a bit better than that frankly.
-
Bill Malone
Re: front page, just updated
As one of the galant losers to the (admittedly) superior final entry and just wanted to say a) I like it and and b) I did not post the previous comment by 'hmmm'.
Think it looks great, although it does use more pics than we were supposed to use to create it...(cheating in my book)
Does the winner wish to remain anon or would he/she step forward for a well done?
Think it looks great, although it does use more pics than we were supposed to use to create it...(cheating in my book)
Does the winner wish to remain anon or would he/she step forward for a well done?
-
Phil K
Re: front page, just updated
If you feel so strongly about it, why didn't you enter the competition?
Just to be clear, six judges voted independently on each of the entries and this one came out on top. I personally quite like it (and I didn't vote), but I accept opinions will vary (as they did amongst the judges).
Just to be clear, six judges voted independently on each of the entries and this one came out on top. I personally quite like it (and I didn't vote), but I accept opinions will vary (as they did amongst the judges).