An Anal question

A read-only and searchable archive of posts made to the BGAFD forum from 11/08/2000 to 14/03/2003.
Goneblind

Re: An Anal question

Post by Goneblind »

I agree. Porn should be erotic. Erotocism requires subtlety, tenderness and mutual enjoyment. It is not erotic to see a woman who is clearly putting up with having her butt plugged and just wants to get it over with. Having the woman pretend that she is getting off on it, when she clearly isn't, is a turn off also. Some women may enjoy anal but, so far as I know, there isn't a woman yet who has her 'g' spot in her arse.

Most Dp scenes are a complete turn off: screen filled with two pairs of bollocks banging away. No thanks.
Sarah Read

Re: An Anal question

Post by Sarah Read »

, When a girl ain't enjoying a good arse fucking she shouldn't do it. But i think there's nothing better than seeing a horny bird getting a nice arse pounding in a porn video. personnely being a girl model in the industry I can honestly say I wouldn't do it if I didn't love it
David J

Re: An Anal question

Post by David J »

All interesting comments, but no-one has really answered my original question.

I'm sure Matt is right to say the girls do it because they want to get paid, but my question really was, who decides whether and what they get paid? My impression is that most porn producers are such cheapskates they would take any excuse to cut down the miserable amounts they pay the girls, and 'sorry love, you haven't done enough anal' would be an obvious excuse, unless there is a clear agreement at the outset how much the girl is expected to do.

Like others, I would rather see a good vag scene than a bad anal one, but one of the advantages of anal is that you can actually see the 'aroused vagina' properly, which you can't if some bloke has his cock in it!

Finally, I know some girls really enjoy anal, and I much prefer it when they do. If they are obviously in pain, it is a turn-off. But best of all, in my humble opinion, is when it is a bit of a challenge for them, but they persevere until they begin to get really turned on. It sometimes happens this way in Ben Dover's movies, which is one of their attractions.
BATTY RIDAH

Re: A question of anal

Post by BATTY RIDAH »

What's all this stuff about industry obsession for anal. If you all rallied up and stop buying videos that contained anal, the subject would be out of sight before long. All this stuff about not liking it when the girl looks like she is in pain, it looks awful, can't see pussy blah, blah, blah...The only reason why anal became such an industry standard in the first place is because producers have latched on to whaT THE PUNTERS ARE BUYING.

Straight sex scenes, vaginal/ oral don't sell as well as it would if it contained a smattering of anal at minimum. Let's face it, most men are fascinated with what they're ladies aren't giving them or blokes without girlfriends can't get- voila anal is here to stay whether you like it or not. What the industry should do to be fair is put a no anal in this video sticker to attract those who don't like it.

In answer to David J's question, the producer/ director is the man in charge of deciding this, and maybe the company that pays him pressurises him. Ask our good old Uncle Ben- he knows. Most male porn stars don't even like doing anal- ask Pascal. The rerason why they do it- For your viewing pleasure sir. Porno movies are spectacles, fantasies that most people will never live which is why most blokes wanna be porn stars.

Would the industry be so fascinated if it knew the realities of what girls have to do to prepare for a scene.

There's absolutely nothing wrong with anal if first the model has consented to it and she is treated nicely about the subject and made to feel comfortable with it- a bit of anal foreplay would'nt go amiss in scenes. It's always been my philosophy that you gotta lick arse before you dick arse. There you go that's my tuppence worth.
magoo

Re: A question of anal

Post by magoo »

The trouble is you cannot find decent movies without anal. It is compulsary. I reckon Uncle Bens stuff would be just as great without the anal but then the Yanks would stop buying it because they are obsessed with gapers etc. I still enjoy the film I just fast forward the anal bits because they get so boring and go on to long. At least Ben puts in a decent amount of vag aswell unlike Rocco and most american gonzo producers who just give us a couple of shots of vag penetration and then head straight for the poo-pipe to "drop anchor in BOTany bay".
Matt

Re: A question of anal

Post by Matt »

I raised the idea that the industry has an obsession with anal sex and I stand by it. You only have to look at the number of videos and dvd's boasting about it to realise that. It is a personal opinion of mine and I can only speak for myself, and I for one am not buying the massive anal features. I agree with you that producers follow market trends, but certain things are promoted in certain ways. A lot of punters, as you point out, get into porn to watch stuff that's a bit 'taboo' in their lives. If something was marketed as 'even more taboo' then it would be appealing to them. To seemingly ignore the influences of marketing as you apparently do is to ignore a major flaw in your argument.

The other flaw in your argument comes to the issue of consent. This is tackled elsewhere on a recent thread so I won't repeat it here - suffice to say consent is not a black and white issue when there are things influencing the decision...
David J

Re: A question of anal

Post by David J »

I agree with those who say it's the customers who want to see anal - it's not the producers forcing it on them.

I think there are three main reasons why anal is popular:

(a) it adds variety to a scene - 20 minutes of the same thing gets boring, whether it is anal, vag, or whatever

(b) like I said earlier, it is visually more interesting

(c) the girls' reactions are more intense and unpredictable. As John Stagliano oddly put it, it gives them a chance to show their 'virility'!
A Model

Re: A question of anal

Post by A Model »

Ok then all you guys that like to see us Models getting a good hard ass pounding within the films that we do.

We do it because some of us like it ok.

Some doit because it pays to do it.

So on that note just for novelty sake ............ you all like Anal so much how about if us Models turned on you men and started to give you one up the poo pipe for say 10 -20 minutes in every film and see how often you come back for more.

any volunteers from the so called hard boys of the industry ????????????????????????????????

We shall see so come on girls about time we gave the blokes the anal sessions just for novelty sake and see how they like it.


A Model
Charlie

Re: A question of anal

Post by Charlie »

As I've said on this forum before, you might as well watch Gay films as watch an all-anal or mostly Anal vid. It seems every Porn vid now (even GG) has to have Anal. Even though a little variation is nice, we are getting far too much of the anal stuff these days.
Matt

Re: A question of anal

Post by Matt »

Alec et al, is there anything we can do about the likes of contributers like this?
Locked