But mostly about Charlotte...
I was going to post this in the main fourm, as I was going open the debate out further, but as there this topic has been started.. However if someone wants to move it across if you think the point I'm making is relevant then please do.
The Church story goes that shes been offered ?1mill to pose starkers for a (quote) 'adult tv channel' and that her people are 'seriously considering' the offer. It was reported in the Daily Star (adult tv channel = TVX?) and Sky News Active/ and on the website on Thursday.
Now whilst I welcome the news - I'm not getting my dick stiff in anticipation just yet, as the main grinder of the story is that 'her people' are going to make the decision whether she disrobes, rather than Charlie herself.
So, why am I pleased that an offer has been made (and not just cus she's a damm attractive young lady, and judging by her recent bikini holiday photos is hiding a cracking pair of 'bells' near the top of the Church tower) as it's the first occasion in ages that someone has made an high money offer to a English celeb like this - And here's the wider question...
If you are a fan of female celb tits and muff, in the last couple of years you've had to make to with paperatzzi beach shots in the tabs for the boobs, and Uncle Hef's organ for some beaver.
So just what have mags brit mags like Mayfair or Penthouse got against whipping out the chequebook offering a 6-7 figure sum and asking a britbabe (non model or porn actress) to flash the gash?
As someone said in an earlier posting she prob turn this one down, and wait a few years, but I really do hope us fellas get the chance to inspect the parish Church bush soon...
charlote church vs lysette anthony
-
Theydon Bois
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: charlote church vs lysette anthony
Oh yeah - Ms Anthony did Penthouse, and not Playboy.
Re: charlotte church vs lysette anthony
It's a bit sad, though, innit, a load of hoo-ha just for a 'celeb' getting her cat out for a few moodily-lit shots. Smacks of desperation, publicity-hunger, and egotism.
And it's always such an, errrmmm, anticlimax.
And it's always such an, errrmmm, anticlimax.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
Officer Dibble
- Posts: 2372
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: charlotte church vs lysette anthony
"So just what have mags brit mags like Mayfair or Penthouse got against whipping out the chequebook offering a 6-7 figure sum and asking a britbabe (non model or porn actress) to flash the gash?"
Probably nothing, apart from the small matter that now they only sell about ten copies a month each there's not much in the kitty to make extravagant offers to celebs. And since now any turnip can be a celeb for 15 minutes it means that all celebs have lost some cache. Even the proper ones who are still worthy of our admiration and awe. So, if perchance some big media concern did shell out it might not be a forgone conclusion wether they would get their dosh back, like would have been guaranteed in a similar senario in the 70's or 80's.
If my mate P R Mann was advising Charlotte he would probably say - Play up to your glamourous image, but don't give 'em everything so soon. That would be tacky and unwise at this stage. Drip feed 'em with ever more tantalizing shots and video clips. Always leave a little in reserve so that they want more. Do a Sharon Stone - "My God! Am I seeing what I think I'm seeing?" Do a sexy Charlotte calendar. Even I'd buy that. Britain needs a proper pin-up girl, we haven't had one for 15 years.
Also, Charlotte shouldn't try and do a Kylie Minogue. She should stay aloof from the pop-tarts, lest she get dragged down with them - Look what's happened to that pretender Holly Valance. If Charlotte plays her cards right she can look forward to a glittering career.
Officer Dibble
Probably nothing, apart from the small matter that now they only sell about ten copies a month each there's not much in the kitty to make extravagant offers to celebs. And since now any turnip can be a celeb for 15 minutes it means that all celebs have lost some cache. Even the proper ones who are still worthy of our admiration and awe. So, if perchance some big media concern did shell out it might not be a forgone conclusion wether they would get their dosh back, like would have been guaranteed in a similar senario in the 70's or 80's.
If my mate P R Mann was advising Charlotte he would probably say - Play up to your glamourous image, but don't give 'em everything so soon. That would be tacky and unwise at this stage. Drip feed 'em with ever more tantalizing shots and video clips. Always leave a little in reserve so that they want more. Do a Sharon Stone - "My God! Am I seeing what I think I'm seeing?" Do a sexy Charlotte calendar. Even I'd buy that. Britain needs a proper pin-up girl, we haven't had one for 15 years.
Also, Charlotte shouldn't try and do a Kylie Minogue. She should stay aloof from the pop-tarts, lest she get dragged down with them - Look what's happened to that pretender Holly Valance. If Charlotte plays her cards right she can look forward to a glittering career.
Officer Dibble
Re: charlotte church vs lysette anthony
Officer Dibble wrote:
If Charlotte plays her cards right she can look forward to a glittering career.
Well, she's already looking BACK at one
If Charlotte plays her cards right she can look forward to a glittering career.
Well, she's already looking BACK at one
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."