how can they hound this innocent man?
-
mike johnson
- Posts: 382
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: how can they hound this innocent man?
jaxxon lives in Chicago IIRC, & I am in Florida. We are what's known as 'furriners.'
-
c.j.jaxxon
- Posts: 1465
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: how can they hound this innocent man?
Nope! I'm in the U.S.
-
c.j.jaxxon
- Posts: 1465
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: how can they hound this innocent man?
Near Chicago to be exact.
-
c.j.jaxxon
- Posts: 1465
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: how can they hound this innocent man?
Yep! Ill state for life!
-
c.j.jaxxon
- Posts: 1465
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: how can they hound this innocent man?
Alright now! Mike Johnson is in Florida. That's where O.J. stays. I ain't got nothin to do with him (O.J.) Chuckles!!!
Re: how can they hound this innocent man?
Yes and look Simpson end in on and jaxxon end in....
Re: how can they hound this innocent man?
I am not sure of OJ did it. I watched as much of the trial on TV as I could, and I would have to say the case against him was "not proven".
In my opinion, what really swung the jury in his favour was clear evidence that the LAPD tried to fit him up by planting his blood at the crime scene.
When he was arrested, a blood sample was taken, but less blood was delivered to the lab than was taken from him. Lo and behold, the LAPD then "found" a bloodstain which had previously been missed by the forensic team. Because OJ could afford great lawyers, they were able to prove that this blood had traces of a substance which is used in syringe plastic. In other words, the blood had not come straight out of OJ, but out of a syringe.
Similarly, blood stains were found on his socks by detectives, but when the socks had been photographed by crime scene examiners, no blood stains were seen in the photos.
There is a big corruption problem in the LAPD. In this case, I am sure detectives thought he was guilty, so they tried to fit him up to firm up their case. Their plan would have worked 99% of the time, it only failed here because OJ had the money to hire experts to show what they did. The detectives were a bit sloppy becuase they were used to fitting up poor people who could not afford stuff like that. I think that when the cops try to fit up an accused person, he deserves to be given the benefit of the doubt. If the cops had a good case, they would not need to manufacture evidence in the first place. For that reason, I think the jury in the OJ trial came to a fair verdict.
In my opinion, what really swung the jury in his favour was clear evidence that the LAPD tried to fit him up by planting his blood at the crime scene.
When he was arrested, a blood sample was taken, but less blood was delivered to the lab than was taken from him. Lo and behold, the LAPD then "found" a bloodstain which had previously been missed by the forensic team. Because OJ could afford great lawyers, they were able to prove that this blood had traces of a substance which is used in syringe plastic. In other words, the blood had not come straight out of OJ, but out of a syringe.
Similarly, blood stains were found on his socks by detectives, but when the socks had been photographed by crime scene examiners, no blood stains were seen in the photos.
There is a big corruption problem in the LAPD. In this case, I am sure detectives thought he was guilty, so they tried to fit him up to firm up their case. Their plan would have worked 99% of the time, it only failed here because OJ had the money to hire experts to show what they did. The detectives were a bit sloppy becuase they were used to fitting up poor people who could not afford stuff like that. I think that when the cops try to fit up an accused person, he deserves to be given the benefit of the doubt. If the cops had a good case, they would not need to manufacture evidence in the first place. For that reason, I think the jury in the OJ trial came to a fair verdict.