Sam Slater wrote:
> What was it regarding T? I miss all the good stuff you
> know......
This twunt, the "free porn" twunt, put up a post which basically condoned rape!
Well done Mods.
Re: Well done Mods.
Marry me, dammit.
I want your Maidenhead.
Or even your Henley-on-Thames.
I want your Maidenhead.
Or even your Henley-on-Thames.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Well done Mods.
jj wrote:
> Marry me, dammit.
> I want your Maidenhead.
>
>
> Or even your Henley-on-Thames.
No, those are sacred. I will never let them become deflowered.
> Marry me, dammit.
> I want your Maidenhead.
>
>
> Or even your Henley-on-Thames.
No, those are sacred. I will never let them become deflowered.
Re: Well done Mods.
OK, time to 'fess up.
You're Boris, aren't you?
You're Boris, aren't you?
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Well done Mods.
!oops! A cock up on the technical front - but it's ok now.
Here's the link you requested jj:
Here's the link you requested jj:
-
Sam Slater
- Posts: 11624
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Well done Mods.
Idiots are everywhere it seems.....
[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
Re: Well done Mods.
Sam Slater wrote:
> Idiots are everywhere it seems.....
You're right Sam.
> Idiots are everywhere it seems.....
You're right Sam.
Re: Well done Mods.
No, he didn't.
Don't get all, excited.
Don't get all, excited.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
Sam Slater
- Posts: 11624
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Well done Mods.
So he didn't now?
So what happened then?
So what happened then?
[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
Re: Well done Mods.
jj wrote:
> No, he didn't.
> Don't get all, excited.
jj, he did.
He wrote (typed) that a "serious sexual preditor would give some serious sexual abuse to cute teens".
To me, and obviously the Mods, that is condoning rape!
> No, he didn't.
> Don't get all, excited.
jj, he did.
He wrote (typed) that a "serious sexual preditor would give some serious sexual abuse to cute teens".
To me, and obviously the Mods, that is condoning rape!