David Sullivan and Karren Brady Arrested

[videokim]

David Sullivan started doing softcore when hardcore was illegal & just carried on as it was easier & unquestioned with all the hardcore around, the way things are going hardcore will be illegal again & he will still be turning out his style of adult films so like him or hate him he as got his head screwed on when it comes to British porn.

Kim xxx

[Officer Dibble]

"the way things are going hardcore will be illegal again"



Yes, no doubt it will be if we don't get rid of Harriet 'Snotty Person' Harman and her NuLabour luvvie pals. I was reading today that she's so earnest and PC that even her NuLab colleagues sniggeringly refer to her as Harriett 'Harperson'.




Officer Dibble

[colonel]

Dibble poses as a Tory to wind people up. He just likes the wind-ups and isn't a Tory at all, I think.

Alice, you are right that the Tories would be more damaging to porn than the present Government.

[Officer Dibble]

"You honestly think the Tories would be any different if they got back in?"

I do indeed.


"it was they who introduced the VRA act in 1984 which led to ridiculous raids and stings, and the whole myth they created around video nasties"

But that was the old 'conservative' Conservatives. Today's 'Nu Tories' are a different kettle of fish. The emphasis now is as much on social liberalism as economic liberalism. Almost all those at the top Tory table are now social liberals. Indeed some are openly gay and they frequently put up both Asian and women MP's as their spokespersons on 'Question Time'.

I should also (once again) point out that Teresa May MP has stood up in The House and categorically said that Harman was talking luvvie cobblers and that the Tories had no intention of following in her anti-man, anti-sex, footsteps. This has been noted on Melon Farmers.

Many people don't seem to understand that the Left has huge 'ishoos' with 'wimmin' and sex. The unalterable socio-biological difference between men and women is one thing they can't legislate against. The problem for them being that difference = inequality. Both men and women are constrained by their socio-biological roles, which are quite separate and different. The two sexes look and behave the way they do due to their genetic programming. This is a huge problem middleclass Marxists and luvvie intellectuals, who can't accept that every person is innately different, with naturally differing roles and abilities. So to get round that they make out that 'wimmin' are underrepresented in the ranks artists, philosophers, scientists, engineers, company bosses and paratroopers because men have repressed them - not that most women would much rather stay at home and simply look after the kids as they are programmed to do.

Of course one of the tools of repression (as the NuLabour luvvies would have it) is sex itself. So they view all sexual objectification of 'wimmin' as 'demeaning' - indeed some of the more shrill and hysterical wimmin's libbers would go a little further and say that the sexual objectification of women was tantamount to rape! They would even have it that every female involved in the sex industry is a 'victim' and is being forced to do it by evil abusive men. This is the ideological background to Harriett 'Nasty Middleclass Person' Harman's antipathy to sex, and commercial sex in particular.

Sometimes I wonder about the forum luvvies and what their metrosexual pals and colleagues would say if they knew one of their number was frequenting demeaning and abusive commercial sex websites. Would they be sent to Coventry ? or would they be sent on one of those Orwellian ?Diversity Awareness? training courses? I guess many forum luvvies are wracked by tremendous middleclass guilt at their ?addiction?. Some of the escorts I know tell me that many of the middleclass chaps who visit them have allsorts of problems and complexes related to their own ?abusive behavior?. What a set of gits, eh?



Officer Dibble

[Mysteryman]

More Drivel from Dibble.

New Conservatives? To quote Jim Royle "My Arse".

The only thing new about Cameron and Co is there way of trying to con people.

The truth about conservatisism is contained in the first syllable.

[colonel]

That's all you need to know about the bunch of liars, cheats and crooks trading together as the 'Conservatives'!

But why does 'Dibble' Mugabe hang around with such people?

[Officer Dibble]

"More Drivel from Dibble."

Oh? So you disagree with my analysis of today?s Conservative Party? I?m intrigued. You must have information that I?m not privy to. Would you care to elaborate? Would you care to outline your concerns and reservations? I?m sure someone as articulate as your good self will have clear fact based evidence of the alleged Conservative plot. I mean, this can?t be simple, narrow-minded, prejudice can it? This can?t be the ignorance, delusion or paranoia often displayed by lesser forumites. This can?t be a result of mental conditioning, brainwashing, self-delusion or bounded rationality, as it is in so many other people? You can?t simply be brooding over imagined sleights and perceived historical wrongs? No, there must actually be something in this. Please lay the evidence of this NuConservative plot before us, before we make a horrid mistake.

By the way, do you agree with my analysis of the Marxist/Socialist attitude to sex? If not, why not. If so, then what do we do about it?


Officer Dibble