Snide wanker tried playing Politics with the big boys when it wasn't needed (Mandelson will fuck up without any help eventually) and got caught with his pants down.
Whoops-a-daisy!
!laugh!!laugh!!laugh!!laugh!!laugh!!laugh!!laugh!!laugh!!laugh!!laugh!!laugh!!laugh!
George Osborne another whoops-a-daisy
Re: George Osborne another whoops-a-daisy
You strike a lighter near Mandelson- and you get fried alive. That's the truth.
I got asked to leave a 'chocolate box' pub this lunchtime for saying that. Tory fuckers.
I got asked to leave a 'chocolate box' pub this lunchtime for saying that. Tory fuckers.
Re: George Osborne another whoops-a-daisy
Andy, you constantly use this phrase "whoops-a-daisy" when Tories get caught with their trousers down, their fingers in the till or in some otherwise embarrassing situation.
It crops up time and time again in your posts.
I'd just be interested to know what turn of phrase you apply to LABOUR sleazeballs - of which (let's face it) there are many.
Or are you audaciously claiming that Labour (Mandelson aside) are beyond reproach?
- Eric
It crops up time and time again in your posts.
I'd just be interested to know what turn of phrase you apply to LABOUR sleazeballs - of which (let's face it) there are many.
Or are you audaciously claiming that Labour (Mandelson aside) are beyond reproach?
- Eric
Re: George Osborne another whoops-a-daisy
Your should have told them you are Colonel.
Re: George Osborne another whoops-a-daisy
The Tories are the Nasty Party- the party of corruption.
I am fed up with them denying it- can't they tell the truth about SOMETHING for a change?
I am fed up with them denying it- can't they tell the truth about SOMETHING for a change?
Re: George Osborne another whoops-a-daisy
Flat_Eric wrote:
> I'd just be interested to know what turn of phrase you apply to
> LABOUR sleazeballs - of which (let's face it) there are many.
>
> Or are you audaciously claiming that Labour (Mandelson aside)
> are beyond reproach?
>
> - Eric
I'll be frank. If you visited the party website you would see no-one is beyond reproach.
For info I also hate Punch and Judy bollocks in Politics but will always correct people like yourself when you are wrong and in the cases of whoops-a-daisy toss pots who choose to use the media for their own gains will delight in showing them to be amateur twats.
The whoops-a-daisy clan is a media phrase that makes Tories look like the tools they are and have always been.
The turn of phrase I use for Labour sleazeballs is usually idiots in Political circles (when I write to them foolhardy and idiotic are other good words) but for purposes such as yours and on boards like this it would be wankers.
Hope that answers your question Eric. Now tell what's your phrase for the TORY sleazeballs - of which (let's face it) there are also many?
> I'd just be interested to know what turn of phrase you apply to
> LABOUR sleazeballs - of which (let's face it) there are many.
>
> Or are you audaciously claiming that Labour (Mandelson aside)
> are beyond reproach?
>
> - Eric
I'll be frank. If you visited the party website you would see no-one is beyond reproach.
For info I also hate Punch and Judy bollocks in Politics but will always correct people like yourself when you are wrong and in the cases of whoops-a-daisy toss pots who choose to use the media for their own gains will delight in showing them to be amateur twats.
The whoops-a-daisy clan is a media phrase that makes Tories look like the tools they are and have always been.
The turn of phrase I use for Labour sleazeballs is usually idiots in Political circles (when I write to them foolhardy and idiotic are other good words) but for purposes such as yours and on boards like this it would be wankers.
Hope that answers your question Eric. Now tell what's your phrase for the TORY sleazeballs - of which (let's face it) there are also many?
Re: George Osborne another whoops-a-daisy
randyandy wrote:
>
I'll sleep better at night knowing that, Andy.
randyandy wrote:
>>
I don't disagree. But I tend not to make a distinction between the parties - terminologically speaking, that is.
I find that the words "crooks", "liars" and "nest-featherers" tend to cover the lot of 'em quite nicely.
But "self-serving wankers" is another good one - for purposes such as yours and on boards like this !wink!.
- Eric
>
I'll sleep better at night knowing that, Andy.
randyandy wrote:
>>
I don't disagree. But I tend not to make a distinction between the parties - terminologically speaking, that is.
I find that the words "crooks", "liars" and "nest-featherers" tend to cover the lot of 'em quite nicely.
But "self-serving wankers" is another good one - for purposes such as yours and on boards like this !wink!.
- Eric
Re: George Osborne another whoops-a-daisy
colonel wrote:
>>
Whereas Labour are the party "of the people, for the people"???
Surely colonel you can't be that blinkered?
- Eric
>>
Whereas Labour are the party "of the people, for the people"???
Surely colonel you can't be that blinkered?
- Eric
Re: George Osborne another whoops-a-daisy
No, Eric.
I merely report the truth as the British people know it.
I merely report the truth as the British people know it.
Re: George Osborne another whoops-a-daisy
colonel wrote:
>>
Presumably you're referring to the very same "British people" who will be turfing Grim Gordon out of Number 10 at the next election?
Yes, the party's poll fortunes have improved slightly just recently - but Labour are a busted flush and have been for a long time now.
I admire your tenacity and loyalty though - misguided though it is !wink!.
- Eric
>>
Presumably you're referring to the very same "British people" who will be turfing Grim Gordon out of Number 10 at the next election?
Yes, the party's poll fortunes have improved slightly just recently - but Labour are a busted flush and have been for a long time now.
I admire your tenacity and loyalty though - misguided though it is !wink!.
- Eric