Sam's disappointments?

[David Johnson]

"I think that some Labour voters round here seem to think they can take their frustrations out on me. Cos that's all it is....frustration."

No. It is factual comments in response to your posts which you are clearly unable to respond to. I address the issues raised in your post which I feel are just wrong.

Here is an example of a response to your post which you appear unable to respond to.

http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=3&i=233285&t=232637

If you can't respond to it, that's okay. That's your prerogative. No problem, but don't dress up your failure to respond as due to me being a "troll" or taking out political frustrations on you. You demean yourself in doing that.


Cheers
D

[Sam Slater]

[quote]You've been bigging up the coalition ever since the election and talking about how great it is,[/quote]

I've said I'm more open-minded and willing to give the thing a go but I wouldn't call it 'bigging it up' in any way. But I think you know that. You just like me being on the end of a barrage of questions from 3 different, disgruntled posters, continually, for 2 whole months. It stopped being a debate and became a 'hammering Sam with questions and taking the piss-fest'.

You need look no further than the title of this very thread to realise that.

I'm sorry I've spoilt your fun by not playing along.

[Sam Slater]

Nah, you're trolling. I gave my reasons why I think you're trolling (2 months-worth of questioning from 3 posters, implications of being stupid/naive/ignorant etc etc, thread titles such as 'Sam's disappointments').

That was over a week ago and you're still calling me out. I'm not here to defend the coalition and explain every crossed 't' and dotted 'i'. I told you why I voted Lib Dem, why I'm open-minded enough to give it a chance (despite my misgivings about the Tories), why I'm disappointed with Labour for not doing more and how I feel they let THEIR voters down, as well as I don't know how many other questions. Many questions I've had to answer more than once and it became clear this wasn't a debate but a massive Q&A session and a bit of a piss take. I mean, how long was it going to last? The whole fucking term? But I've said all this before, haven't I? Clearly you've ignored my reasons and come up with a few more questions and titters about my absence/reluctance to answer yet more questions. That, I feel, is trolling because you're just looking for a reaction.

When I don't answer questions I'm supposedly 'demolished' and when I spend time giving people thorough, polite answers I get digs about how many posts I've posted and my lack of social life. All in good fun, no doubt, but trolling nonetheless.

I'm sorry I've spoilt your fun.

[David Johnson]

"Many questions I've had to answer more than once and it became clear this wasn't a debate but a massive Q&A session and a bit of a piss take."

You seem to be developing a persecution complex which is quite amusing for someone who has never been backward in handing out insults to a range of people on this forum.

No, you have just proved yourself to be completely unable to answer factual comments as opposed to sharing guesswork. And the fact that you have answered some questions more than once, is more down to your failure, more often than not, to come up with any evidence to support your views.

In this part of the thread you appear very willing to post at length as to why you have been hard done by, but totally unwilling to respond to my comments about why your view of the Labour loan to Sheffield Forgemasters is fundamentally wrong.

Your humiliation on this subject is now complete and it is probably for the best that you do not respond to any more comments in this debate in order to avoid further embarrassment. You are clearly not comfortable with debating at a detailed level about the issues and appear out of your depth on this subject.

Cheers
D

[Ned]

Maybe the reason you were being questioned about this is because you were continually trolling one person in particular yourself, completely unable to answer any detailed questions or respond to posts that were factual, detailed and well written.

Being asked questions in detail that demolish your argument is not trolling.

[Sam Slater]

If your latest post isn't about attacking me to provoke a reaction then I don't know what is! You're just upset I'm not going to be on call to answer every fucking question you throw at me for the next five years.

Grow up, Johnson.

[David Johnson]

You say
"You're just upset I'm not going to be on call to answer every fucking question you throw at me for the next five years.
Grow up, Johnson."

!boring! !boring!

Unlike you to avoid dealing with the topic being discussed !happy!

I repeat my earlier statement

In this part of the thread you appear very willing to post at length as to why you have been hard done by, but totally unwilling to respond to my comments about why your view of the Labour loan to Sheffield Forgemasters is fundamentally wrong.

Cheers
D

[Sam Slater]

Because replying to tell you why I'm answering all your questions is polite (I could have just ignored you completely).

Not that it stops you carrying on with the trolling. Carry on....

[David Johnson]

"Not that it stops you carrying on with the trolling. Carry on...."

So easy to insult isn't Sam? So difficult to defend your views when challenged.

Cheers
D

[David Johnson]

You said

"Because replying to tell you why I'm answering all your questions is polite "

and...

"You're just upset I'm not going to be on call to answer every fucking question you throw at me for the next five years.

Grow up, Johnson."


Ah, yes, Sam, that's you. Polite to a fault !happy!