Maja = Hayni Hilford
About Klinik Report. If that video really was made in 1999, then I sincerely doubt that Katja Belise is in it. Katja Belise quit the porn biz in 1997. The screencap doesn't convince me either.
Also, is Anita Gyongy supposed to be the same girl as the Anita Gyongy who worked for Private in 1995?
Maja
-
Walter Burns
- Posts: 1649
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Maja
[b]IAFD, supporters of beastiality! Just say NO![/b]
Re: Maja
Walter Burns wrote:
> Maja
> =
> Hayni
> Hilford
>
Yes, it is her.
> About
> Klinik
> Report. If that video really was made in 1999, then I
> sincerely doubt that
> Katja
> Belise is in it. Katja Belise quit the porn biz in 1997.
> The screencap doesn't convince me either.
>
> Also, is
> Anita
> Gyongy supposed to be the same girl as the Anita Gyongy
> who worked for Private in 1995?
The girl in the second screencap from Klinik Report is not that Anita Gyongy who worked for Private.
> Maja
> =
> Hayni
> Hilford
>
Yes, it is her.
> About
> Klinik
> Report. If that video really was made in 1999, then I
> sincerely doubt that
> Katja
> Belise is in it. Katja Belise quit the porn biz in 1997.
> The screencap doesn't convince me either.
>
> Also, is
> Anita
> Gyongy supposed to be the same girl as the Anita Gyongy
> who worked for Private in 1995?
The girl in the second screencap from Klinik Report is not that Anita Gyongy who worked for Private.
Re: Maja
Thanks. I'll separate those two making a new Beatrix (though she may be the one already listed) and a Stefanie, and merge Maja under Hayni Hilford. Not my caps, but I should have spotted Hayni. I've removed the pictures from Anita Gyongy and Katja Belise, and added Maja's to Hayni Hilford.
Re: Maja
Hey,
Thank you for the ID work.
I am the culprit of this mess. Names at the end of the movie and in the extra section were different and these were first names.
To answer Walter about the date 1999: it is the DVD release date. When a DVD does not indicate a production date, I usually take the date at which it was put on sale. The movie can thus well have been shot before.
Cheers.
Thank you for the ID work.
I am the culprit of this mess. Names at the end of the movie and in the extra section were different and these were first names.
To answer Walter about the date 1999: it is the DVD release date. When a DVD does not indicate a production date, I usually take the date at which it was put on sale. The movie can thus well have been shot before.
Cheers.
-
Walter Burns
- Posts: 1649
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Maja
ben3 wrote:
> To answer Walter about the date 1999: it is the DVD release
> date. When a DVD does not indicate a production date, I usually
> take the date at which it was put on sale. The movie can thus
> well have been shot before.
That's true, but the presence of Hayni suggest it was made in 1998 at the latest.
btw, Hayni's tattoo got bigger later in her carreer.
> To answer Walter about the date 1999: it is the DVD release
> date. When a DVD does not indicate a production date, I usually
> take the date at which it was put on sale. The movie can thus
> well have been shot before.
That's true, but the presence of Hayni suggest it was made in 1998 at the latest.
btw, Hayni's tattoo got bigger later in her carreer.
[b]IAFD, supporters of beastiality! Just say NO![/b]
-
Walter Burns
- Posts: 1649
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Maja
Silly me. That was supposed to be at the earliest instead of at the latest. AFAIK, Hayni started in 1998.
[b]IAFD, supporters of beastiality! Just say NO![/b]