XNKs.

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of Continental European female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
Post Reply
fudgeflaps
Posts: 3339
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

XNKs.

Post by fudgeflaps »

I have a copy of 'Titten Pussies Harte Kerle', and XNKs 4236 and 4238 are one and the same; her hair is styled differently in her scenes.

I'm pretty sure XNKs 4591 and 4334 are Magella , who was in a few of the productions of that era.

XNK3800 is indeed Antonia Laffite.

jj
Posts: 28225
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: XNKs.

Post by jj »

1st one, Y, deffo.
2nd: absolutely not.

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
fudgeflaps
Posts: 3339
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: XNKs.

Post by fudgeflaps »

YEah, on review, XNK4591 ISN'T Magella; 4334 is, IMO.

alec
Posts: 9866
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:22 pm

Re: XNKs.

Post by alec »

Are you referring to the Magella possibilities here or by '1st one' do you mean 4236 and 4238?

It seems to me that Magella has a flatter nose than 4591, though I haven't got a profile view of Magella.
Walter Burns
Posts: 1649
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: XNKs.

Post by Walter Burns »

fudgeflaps wrote:

> YEah, on review, XNK4591 ISN'T Magella; 4334 is, IMO.
>

I don't think either are Magella.
[b]IAFD, supporters of beastiality! Just say NO![/b]
jj
Posts: 28225
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: XNKs.

Post by jj »

Sorry, 4236= 4238.
Give me a mo, and I'll look at 4591............

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
jj
Posts: 28225
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: XNKs.

Post by jj »

You MIGHT be right- but I doubt it.

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
Post Reply