This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of Continental European female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
Don't think this scenes are from 2006. Because none of the girls was active in
this year (acc. to iafd/egafd). They worked between 2001 (earliest entry) and
2004 (last entry). Charmaine is only listed for 2002/2003 at iafd, so I estimate
2002/2003 as production date.
>
> As deezer wrote, the movie is defintely not from 2006 but
> probably 2003.
-----------------------------------------------------
The DVD-Content was set in Dec. 2006.
Produced in 2006.
As I recall to have bought it round 2007 it makes totally sense.
Still I also think to see material that I rate to
be recorded around 2004!
But how to prove that, even more as the DVD was released
about two years later!?
I can say: Looks like 2004 TO ME.. (it does)
But, officially it was produced 2006.
So what can I do?! !annoyed!
Tell me how to do it and I will! Promise![/b]
------------------------------------------------------------------
>The unknown female is not Kira Red. The unknown male is indeed
> Sascha.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I have troubles with that girl.
If it is not Kira who elese can she be?
And THX for ID-ing "Sascha"
Based on the single cap I'm not convinced the guy in scene 2.
> is Pascal White.
--------------------------
You hardly see the guy at all...
I will see if I can get a better cap...
A little cut from the film that might help in terms of ID-ing "Pascal"
who speaks something thst SOUNDS like French to me, but as
I do not speak a single word French for real..
(otherwise would have thougt of probably "Jens Modena")
Johray1 wrote:
> The DVD-Content was set in Dec. 2006.
> Produced in 2006.
(Yet) another ongoing task for the egafd gnomes is the weeding-out of
anomalous dates based entirely on DVD-release info.
It's not always apparent that a disc may have had an earlier release on
VHS; or contains older material which has been either bought-in or 'sat on'
by the producers. In these cases - if no other corroboration is available -
one has to guestimate a date based on the performers' filmos.
I'd go for 2003, possibly even '02, based on the material.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
jj wrote:
> "...if no other corroboration is
> available -
> one has to guestimate a date based on the performers' filmos.
> I'd go for 2003, possibly even '02, based on the material."
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In case something like this should be apparent again:
Would it be "proper" to state:
"Released in 2006; containing material from ca. 2002-2004"?!
Thanks for the video. The guy is not Pascal White. I neither know him nor the unknown female.
With regard to the date of production: The tattoo of Nathalia was added around summer/fall 2003. Based on the cap of the scene selection it looks like the tattoo is not present in "Pension Olga". Therefore the content must have been shot earlier.
marcel_43 wrote:>
> Thanks for the video. The guy is not Pascal White. I neither
> know him nor the unknown female.>
> With regard to the date of production: The tattoo of Nathalia
> was added around summer/fall 2003. Based on the cap of the
> scene selection it looks like the tattoo is not present in
> "Pension Olga". Therefore the content must have been shot
> earlier.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks!
Good to know!
So, we will have to leave the guy and the girl as "Unknowns", right?!
And...
Like I said; I also thought of the recording to be done prior to 2006.
With your Information added to the bill, it is clear: Spring/Summer 2003 or
most-likely earlier...
Still, the DVD was released in 2006.
That is what I have to put down as year of release; no matter
how "wrong" it occures to be in terms of "Date of recording"
Whatsoever:
Thanks for the infos and Cheers! !drink!
