Been researching the cast of a film not including Kelly [13]
but having recently mentioned her "diverse" looks and the practice
of brushing her breast-mole on pictures out...
...I stumbled upon Irina [10]
and just thought: "Aye, I know you... you are Kelly in your more
'glamorous-look' of 2006, aren't you?!" !wink!
What do you think?
[IMG]http://img159.imagevenue.com/loc12/th_29065_Kelly_is_Irina_123_12lo.jpg[/IMG]
Kelly [13] is Irina [10] as well... [Gee whiz!]
Re: Kelly [13] is Irina [10] as well... [Gee whiz!]
Thx, merged under K [13].
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Kelly [13] is Irina [10] as well... [Gee whiz!]
jj wrote:
> Thx, merged under K [13].
--------------------------------------
Perfect, thanks! !nerd!
> Thx, merged under K [13].
--------------------------------------
Perfect, thanks! !nerd!
Re: Kelly [13] is Irina [10] as well... [Gee whiz!]
New [booblicious] headshot, too.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Kelly [13] is Irina [10] as well... [Gee whiz!]
jj wrote:
> New [booblicious] headshot, too.
----------------------------------------------
Thanks, jj! That makes totally sense! !happy!
Don't want to be trouble... !sad! just researched "Irina" a wee bit and
tried to imagine if a totally "pimped up" could also have starred in some "Rocco" films.
As I'm not into these and only know the pics of her profile but think to have
a certain eye for "Versatile Kelly"...
Could she possibly be "Camilla Ken"
as well?! She looks VERY different, but yet I sense to see her
"natural look" shining through, as remainings of the "brushed-out" mole
on her breast too....
[IMG]http://img177.imagevenue.com/loc519/th_38908_camilla_Kelly_123_519lo.jpg[/IMG]
> New [booblicious] headshot, too.
----------------------------------------------
Thanks, jj! That makes totally sense! !happy!
Don't want to be trouble... !sad! just researched "Irina" a wee bit and
tried to imagine if a totally "pimped up" could also have starred in some "Rocco" films.
As I'm not into these and only know the pics of her profile but think to have
a certain eye for "Versatile Kelly"...
Could she possibly be "Camilla Ken"
as well?! She looks VERY different, but yet I sense to see her
"natural look" shining through, as remainings of the "brushed-out" mole
on her breast too....
[IMG]http://img177.imagevenue.com/loc519/th_38908_camilla_Kelly_123_519lo.jpg[/IMG]
-
download201
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Kelly [13] is Irina [10] as well... [Gee whiz!]
She hasr a mole.
Re: Kelly [13] is Irina [10] as well... [Gee whiz!]
I'm not entirely convinced...but meh.
Re: Kelly [13] is Irina [10] as well... [Gee whiz!]
Tederoni2 wrote:
> I'm not entirely convinced...but meh.
----------------------------------------------
She is amazingly versatile, tell ya...
If the iafd is right... it has to be her.
Camilla Ken is listed to be part of "Lez Cuties 5" credited as "Irina"
Honestly speaking, the iafd profie-pic just adds another "variation"
of her 1.000 looks and I would never have been able to tell it's her
by this alone... Tough!
[IMG]http://img133.imagevenue.com/loc114/th_43363_camillaken_f_camillaken_123_114lo.jpg[/IMG]
> I'm not entirely convinced...but meh.
----------------------------------------------
She is amazingly versatile, tell ya...
If the iafd is right... it has to be her.
Camilla Ken is listed to be part of "Lez Cuties 5" credited as "Irina"
Honestly speaking, the iafd profie-pic just adds another "variation"
of her 1.000 looks and I would never have been able to tell it's her
by this alone... Tough!
[IMG]http://img133.imagevenue.com/loc114/th_43363_camillaken_f_camillaken_123_114lo.jpg[/IMG]
Re: Kelly [13] is Irina [10] as well... [Gee whiz!]
So.... do I need to[re-]change anything?
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Kelly [13] is Irina [10] as well... [Gee whiz!]
jj wrote:
> So.... do I need to[re-]change anything?
-----------------------------------------
That would mean a huge effort, I see... and would make me feel 'guilty" !sad!
So, let's just keep it our secret! !happy!
> So.... do I need to[re-]change anything?
-----------------------------------------
That would mean a huge effort, I see... and would make me feel 'guilty" !sad!
So, let's just keep it our secret! !happy!