*MAJOR BREAKTHROUGH!*
Long unknown XNK4985 is in fact a younger already listed Vanda [3]!!!
[IMG]http://img149.imagevenue.com/loc110/th_459669769_Image1_123_110lo.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://img259.imagevenue.com/loc487/th_461054411_Image4_123_487lo.jpg[/IMG]
XNK4985 = Vanda [3]
![[IMG]http://img149.imagevenue.com/loc110/th_459669769_Image1_123_110lo.jpg[/IMG]](http://img149.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=459669769_Image1_123_110lo.jpg){kind=link}
![[IMG]http://img259.imagevenue.com/loc487/th_461054411_Image4_123_487lo.jpg[/IMG]](http://img259.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=461054411_Image4_123_487lo.jpg){kind=link}
Re: XNK4985 = Vanda [3]
More support for my distaste for glossy, overly-made-up, misleading
headshots from photoshoots : -)
headshots from photoshoots : -)
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: XNK4985 = Vanda [3]
She seems to have transitioned from super nerdy, cute redhead, to glossy short haired blonde. You would never know at a glance.
Re: XNK4985 = Vanda [3]
This is why I'm progressively demoting such images. IMO the
headshot should be the best possible representation of a girl as
she appeared on film.
headshot should be the best possible representation of a girl as
she appeared on film.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."