UKSTUDS/BEN DOVER

A read-only and searchable archive of posts made to the BGAFD forum from 11/08/2000 to 14/03/2003.
Dr No

Re: UKSTUDS/BEN DOVER

Post by Dr No »

I'll go with that, if only to poke the establishment in the eye.

Dr No.
lordjohn

Re: UKSTUDS/BEN DOVER

Post by lordjohn »

Thank you for your similar perception. The Traci Syndrome is second only to the GIANT BLOW UP BARBIE phenomena apparent on most UK cable Satellite Channels where the same old pumped up boilers get their mascara ruined by the same old bored studs night after night.

This can only be the result of the big American companies dumping their material chopped down soft into the cable bin for tiny amounts of money.

This happened with stills in the eighties. A lot of smudgers gave up the business of producing good new material for the uk magazines because agents were flooding our revered market with 10th use sets from all over the show shot by foreign johnnies who only wanted a pound a trannie.

That seems to have reverted.

I feel a channel which had the courage to put on new stuff most of the time would do incredible business just by word of mouth...but then of course the fans of Giant Blow Up Barbies and Scarred Tracies would explode into a plethora of silicon.

Check out Motors channel on Sky.....not men and motors, during their nightscreen stuff they have some lovelies oiled up in a sauna...nothing hard but great looking girls being nice and erotic.
magoo

Re: UKSTUDS/BEN DOVER

Post by magoo »

Perhaps Ben cant be bothered to post due to having a life and a lovely wife.


You lot really piss me off with your "I'm a producer" bollocks.

Dont bother sending the vids Dr No cos I just stopped the cheque.

You producers are a bunch of moaners.

You lot should appreciate us punters but instead you take the piss.
Ace

Re: UKSTUDS/BEN DOVER

Post by Ace »

I am VERY sceptical on the financial gain these stunning women make. Of course it is their perogative whether or not to undertake the work, but I, for one, do pity these fine girls getting ripped off with what their British counterparts make. I have a video 'Fun with Uncle Harry' series in Prague, and the ladies are real stunna's, but it does nothing for me as I know the payment they have taken is a fraction of what they REALLY deserve. Lets see how mant British stars would work for ?20 per scene..........the answer wouldn't be a polite rubuttal, more like an old fashioned 'Fuck Off!'
Dr No

Re: UKSTUDS/BEN DOVER

Post by Dr No »

What's up with Magoo? What's he talking about? He seems very irrational and irritable today. Hey, magoo did you finish that course of tablets I prescribed?

Dr No.
magoo

Re: UKSTUDS/BEN DOVER

Post by magoo »

Indeed I did Dr No. Unfortunately you forgot to tell me your presciption should not be mixed with booze. That explains my rather bad mood last night. I thought it had worn off but then I found myself screaming verbal abuse about over opinionated pornographers during the night.
John

Cost!

Post by John »

Ok... so eastern bloc is cheaper due to the lower average wage etc... social and economic conditions...

But I dare say the cost savings are rapidly eaten up and probably even exceeded by the financial costs in getting over there and facilitating the whole thing.

I'm sorry Magoo, but I find your tact on this rather offensive and very, very negative.
jj

Re: UKSTUDS/BEN DOVER

Post by jj »

Can one be 'OVER-opinionated'?
Sorry. I'll go away now.
jj

Re: UKSTUDS/BEN DOVER

Post by jj »

But in relative terms what they're paid puts them head-and-shoulders above, say, a seamstress.
A US-dollar fee goes a long way in an E Euro economy.
I'm not saying it's right or wrong, but half-truths get us nowhere: and it's not porn's fault that the entire economy of the ex-Soviet Bloc is still way behind the West's, is it?
lordjohn

Re: UKSTUDS/BEN DOVER

Post by lordjohn »

Exactly. In the town where we were the one big local supermarket employs fifty girls in rotation, all for a day or so each so lots of people get a bit of money.

The dollars we gave them both for test shoots (which a lot of folk don't shell out for) and for the actually shoots were gratefully received.

A one day dildo shoot gave the girl the equivalent of a months money in a more normal job. I can say hand on heart that we were not exploiting anyone.

The only guy profiteering was an American who was taking bundles of commission from girls and charging over the odds for lighting equipment hire. We also discovered he had doubled the cost of the rental of a very average apartment we used and pocketed the other half.

American...you see not British with a conscience. We also made it clear to the girls that if any of them wanted to come and work in England that we would help them find gigs.....last comment from me on all this....planning another trip to somewhere really expensive where I plan to spend much more money on the girls just to vindicate myself and the British punter. Which of course I am one myself........Producers dont get their DVD's for nothing......if I fancy one I pay for it same as any one else.....don't see where the divide comes in really!
Locked