Lana Cox and The Tower

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
Post Reply
David

Lana Cox and The Tower

Post by David »

Just read Lana's entry and it says that a doble was used for anal scenes. Is this correct? Why would they use a stunt bum?
alec
Posts: 9866
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:22 pm

Re: Lana Cox and The Tower

Post by alec »

We wouldn't have put that in if we didn't think it was correct. The information came from a post made by the lady herself on the newsgroup alt.fan.televisionx a few years ago, and having seen the video, in my opinion the evidence does not contradict her. She said anal was too painful. I know there is a photoset which includes anal, but anal for stills might be bearable, anal for film might not, and in any case this might be the occasion that made up her mind that anal was too painful.

Rather than a repetition of arguments already rehearsed, those who disagree might like to search the Archive forum where those disagreements have been stated before.
bryan

Re: Lana Cox and The Tower

Post by bryan »

seen it,it is all lana.
Dave Wells

Re: Lana Cox and The Tower

Post by Dave Wells »

Yes it is correct, it is Lisa Stretton arse I think.
JP

Re: Lana Cox and The Tower

Post by JP »

I saw that scene last night on sex view, Lana appeared to have a tatoo on her ass and in the anal scene the model also had the same tatoo, either it was Lana or Private paid attention to detail.

JP
Ace

Re: Lana Cox and The Tower

Post by Ace »

The butterfly tattoo? I was convinced it was comrade Lana, but she swears it was a double.
Wheeley

Re: Lana Cox and The Tower

Post by Wheeley »

All I will say is, check out the small "wart" near the said arse, a double with the same "wart", what are the odds?
David

Re: Lana Cox and The Tower

Post by David »

If it is Lisa Stretton's arse and not Lana's, then why not use Lisa for the whole scene (no pun intended). Lana was not the star of the film - only a bitpart actor (but what bits!!). Why go to the trouble of getting someone in for just that part (again no pun intended)? It doesn't make sense...I can't see Private going to the expense of hiring a stunt arse for that one scene.
Post Reply