Page 2 of 3

Re: The future of porn

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2004 2:04 pm
by Lasher_uk
I agree with ya, it should be a bit of fun too. I like to watch them with the missus and even she says they are becoming almost legalised brutality.

Some girls will be early into those Tena pads.

Lasher

Re: The future of porn

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2004 4:36 pm
by Heathray
My own views, sorry if they offend!

More quality, less cheapo production.

Whilst I am no Linda Barker on interior design I think the setting and aesthetics do improve a film if they cost more than the ?10 which most UK producers seem to spend.

The most gorgeous girl getting banged in some cheapo setting loses the appeal for me.

Also more lingerie please, many men love it when a woman makes an effort to look sexy, the plain white panties thing does nothing for me I'm afraid.
Kerry Matthews especially looked stunning when she played Pussy Malone in high heels and stcokings.

Better make up artists, some girls wear a weeks worth one shoot.

Less Gonzo, it is way past its' sell by date.

No plastic tits, cheap tattoos or body piercings.

More tit fucking.

No spitting, a foul habit and likely to get a smack in the teeth off most girls I know.

A big recruitemnt drive to get more top class British girls into the business. I know it is cheaper to shoot in Hungary but the girls seem to be very robotic and unerotic.

Lose the stupid humour. If I want comedy I'll watch Bill Hicks or Porridge.

Re: The future of porn

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 pm
by Officer Dibble
Hmm, sounds a well tasty recipe Heathray. I'll go for that...might even make room for seconds.

Officer D

Re: The future of porn

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2004 3:37 am
by Kane
I like porn that's in your face.

Gorgeous babes being well f**ked by 2 or more horny studs with lots of dp and anal. It doesn't get any more subtle than that.

I appreciate a female pornstar who puts all their effort into their performance. And not being banged like a lump of meat.

Dear Lorraine Ansell was a prime example - who can forget her performance with 2 well hung studs in "Rocco More Than Ever"!

Also Gilly Sampson in "Lady In Spain".

Wendy Taylor and Georgette Neal and give consistently horny perofrmances.

I also hear good things about Faye Rampton and Betty Swollocks and look forward to seeing their performances.


Re: The future of porn

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2004 11:00 am
by What?
Surely what we have right now, is a situation where many different genres of porn are available to us. If people want gonzo, then it is available... if people want the american storyline based porn, then its available... if people want double anal, gagging, choking vids, then they are available. We all like different things, and we all seem to be pretty well catered for by the porn industry these days IMO, with DVD/videos and internet sites.
Its each to his own as far as Im concerned.


Re: The future of porn

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:07 pm
by kitten kong
Funny enough as soon as I see a film set on a tropical beach, or fancy location, I turn it off, because somehow you know exactly whats going to happen next.The same old stereotypes will appear and shag as per usual.So give me a crap location or alleyway anyday. By the way Hungarian girls are not cheaper, they are the same as here and in terms of their low cost of living, they're raking it in. They only seem robotic, because this is all the directors want of them, underneath they are as horny as any girls anywhere else in the world.

Re: The future of porn

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:36 pm
by Deuce Bigolo
Theres a place for everything

Personally I'm not genre driven

I don't shop by large breasts,dp,a2m,rape,interracial,gang bang etc
but purely go by who I want to see

Then its just a matter of a bit of research to find the appropriate vehicle
and I'm off

If I were making a flick I'd concentrate on trying the show off the female body especially in the build up to the sex-not some stupid plot that is a cue to go and make a pot of tea.

Erotic need not mean a high value production ala Andrew Blake or Michael Ninn IMHO

cheers
B....OZ





cheers
B....OZ

Re: The future of porn

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2004 5:46 pm
by Heathray
Good points all round. My taste varies from the next man. Gonzo sells, as does Private's high prod value stuff.

Personally I prefer the woman to be treated with some respect and not as a piece of meat.

BTW Michael Ninn's stuff leaves me cold, far too much fancy camera and video work, very tedious.

However as more and more women freely admit to enjoy watching porn I think we could see more female directors. I think some classier girls who are scared of working for a predominantly male run industry may be more keen to work under a female director (no pun intended).

Interesting post Tomsk (and how is Uncle Bulgaria these days?).

Re: White Panties

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2004 9:55 pm
by Snake Diamond
White Panties do have their place, they can be erotic in certain circumstances, but looking at porn on the net of late, so many of the girls are wearing White Panties, & not all of them are plain white, frilly or fancy 1s have also been worn.

But i do agree, make a differant colour with the panties, the obligatory Black, Red or various assorted light shades do make a differance, & the Ladies gotta wear some sexy stockings & sussies from time to time.

Even if its just a Micro Thong or G-String, Colour is the key


Re: The future of porn

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2004 10:58 pm
by chapel
You can say that again. I popped into a porn shop in Carlise. ?50 for a dvd!! But when the bloke behind the counter noticed my checking my bulging wallet he kept offering to give me three if I bought two , buy three and I`ll throw in four. Christ I thought I was on a game show. Almost asked if I could phone a friend. In the end up I ordered online after searching for a site that takes switch. The shop in question has a bit of a reputation for selling pirate copies or if you`re really lucky you go home and find you`ve forked out a pile of cash for a blank tape.