Re: 3rd adult film actor found to have HIV
Posted: Tue May 04, 2004 6:42 pm
Hiya Mark,
Apologies for not having spoken to you earlier but a MILLION CONGRATS on your forthecoming marriage. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy.
I have been pre-occupied with a VERY poorly pussycat (The Chairman) and although she is still not well, SHE IS COMING HOME TOMORROW so I am totally ECSTATIC..................................................
Back to the thread: Sharon Mitchell may or may not be the paragon that she professes to be, but I find her secrecy disturbing.
As has been said, nothing is for nothing and whilst her organisation is declared as "non-profit making", it would take a fool to assume that she cannot at least make a living out of it. So be it.
However, the secrecy aspect; the timing of tests, as to when, by whom etc is VERY objectionable to me, as is anyone else who may have info on the performers involved - however peripheraly.
"Professional confidentiality" in this context is totally out of order and anyone who has one ounce of concern for performers in our industry should - indeed - be obliged and duty bound, to list fully and completely, ALL who have had the remotest contact with infected or suspected infected or carriers of this DEATH SENTENCE.
Apologies for not having spoken to you earlier but a MILLION CONGRATS on your forthecoming marriage. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy.
I have been pre-occupied with a VERY poorly pussycat (The Chairman) and although she is still not well, SHE IS COMING HOME TOMORROW so I am totally ECSTATIC..................................................
Back to the thread: Sharon Mitchell may or may not be the paragon that she professes to be, but I find her secrecy disturbing.
As has been said, nothing is for nothing and whilst her organisation is declared as "non-profit making", it would take a fool to assume that she cannot at least make a living out of it. So be it.
However, the secrecy aspect; the timing of tests, as to when, by whom etc is VERY objectionable to me, as is anyone else who may have info on the performers involved - however peripheraly.
"Professional confidentiality" in this context is totally out of order and anyone who has one ounce of concern for performers in our industry should - indeed - be obliged and duty bound, to list fully and completely, ALL who have had the remotest contact with infected or suspected infected or carriers of this DEATH SENTENCE.