Page 2 of 2
Re: It's not her !!
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2001 8:13 pm
by Maurie
Photos can also be printed reversedjoe king wrote:
>
> I reckon it could be her with the tatoo photoshopped.
> Compare
>
>
>
>
> and
>
>
> She has a mole on the breast on the second pic which is
> more prominent than the first, the jewellery is similar also.
Re: ldm \h/c photo tease
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2001 10:04 pm
by me2
thanks for the preveiw joe. whats the other link all about?
Re: ldm \h/c photo tease
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2001 2:56 am
by joe king
Brigitte Lahaie
Re: It's not her !!
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2001 6:56 pm
by Diblob
I think the photo has just been mirrored thats all, that would explain the missing tattoo, its on the other arm!
Re: It's not her !!
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2001 11:06 pm
by monkeyman
It is her. There is no doubt in my mind. Ignore the tatoo (or lack of) as they is not important. The jewellry too. What you can tell by is the little things. And I really do mean the little things. She's got two large freckles/small moles, whatever on the rear of her right shoulder, next to her shoulder blade about an inch and a half between each other. There are another pair on the inside of her left arm. One about a few inches above her left elbow, the ther a similar disance below the left elbow. Shit, i've turned into a fucking spotter and a half.
Re: It's not her !!
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2001 4:48 pm
by Briz
I reckon it is her but I can't understand why her face is cut out.