egafd.com

I was out at a birthday bash on Saturday night when a girlfriend of a friend got a bit tipsy and railed on about not understanding how me and my partner can do what we do and not have issues with it.

10 years ago I had the same issues that civilians have to their partner and themselves working in this business and welcomed the chance to expalin to her that she shouldnt try to understand why we can and she can't and the fact she cant means that she shouldnt ever in case it shatters her world perception on things and needs counselling.

Porn has taught me a lot of things about myself and personally I have transcended the restrictions of jealousy and insecurity that are to be found in a lot of people in "normal" society.

To me, it is work and while you can have fun in this business, your life after it is totally different which is why I can understand people in this industry relate better with those who are in it. But it doesnt mean we are devoid of the emotional trappings of those in civilian life.

Truth is I see more hypocrisy in civil life than i do in porn which is more honest in alot of its motives: Lust, power, greed, selfishness. Whatever you are as a person this industry will define you for what you are.

I can equate the same to religion (if you take it by its meaning- is a way of life in itself). You see all these so called God fearing people, trying to do right by the Good Lord himself but are the first to flout the rules when it comes down to it.

Its funny but the best hoochies in this business usually come from a religious, Jehovahs witness back ground. You have to ask yourself why is that?

I think deep down, we all know the answer lies in repression. Porn embraces everything in all its fucked up-edness and doesnt judge...But the one thing everyone wanting in on this business is: Beware of what you really want, as it may very well find you before long and then it depends if you really want to be stood up and counted with the rest of us.

Thats the difference I guess between them and us. Sorry to sound a bit cryptic but I'm sure some of you may get what I'm trying to say.

I'm sure most people have their own reasons and philosophies on this business and no way should my view be taken as a general one with regards to everyone else in it.

You wrote Elle Brooke/Ian Tate and they were the only two apired together which to me indicated that you were saying that they were getting married to each other.

If you meant to say that they were getting married but not to each other I would suggest you wrote Elle Brooke, Ian Tate rather than use the / which seems to indicate that they were marring each other. They were also included in the same comma instead of having seperate commas for each name.

Just about to post the exact same as you did. Mysteryman 'has' paired Ian & Elle together, while all the others were seperated with commas.

Careful Tel,

Your starting to sound like someone else LOL!

I'd be interested to know what Sam Slater and Hawkins' qualifications are regarding English Language.

"Alicia Rhodes, Elle Brooke/Ian Tate, Faye Rampton, Theresa May all are now/about to be parents" is a clause dealing with those people who are porn stars about to become, or who have become, parents... "and Donna Marie and Lara Lee have both stated they will be getting married" is another clause dealing with two porn stars about to be married.


Elle Brooke/Ian Tate are a couple who are having a child together, that is why the are linked by a slash. There is no indication either in the construction of the clause, or in the way that clause is linked to the second clause, that they are married.

Now I hope that wasn't too hard for you

Goddamnit you're correct. Pairing them together made me assume you were talking about marriage, but thats because of another conversation elswhere.

My apologies.

Apology accepted

Cheers,

Mysteryman

And ask yourself who started this trend off,

Phil Mc..........o and Bev,