Page 2 of 3

Re: Alexis Silver - surely not implants!

Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:56 pm
by peter@video-xtra.com
Come on - they're not that big! I've shot 20 girls with bigger boobs, but Alexis's are very nice and of course 100% as nature intended!

Peter


Re: Alexis Silver - surely not implants!

Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:00 pm
by jj
I was using poetic licence in order to work the gag in.
Unfortunately, Minka isn't British : -)


Re: Alexis Silver - surely not implants!

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:30 am
by kernal sandez
Apparently it was Alexis herself on a blog a couple of years ago that
mentioned it - they were "enhanced" in L.A.

Angelique and Minka

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:46 pm
by peter@video-xtra.com
When Minka and the wonderfully enhanced Brazilian goddess Angelique first visited UK, I went with then to the opening of For Your Eyes Only in Park Royal, where they entertained the guests and rather upset some of the more modestly endowed local dancers.

The next day I took Angelique to Kensington where I lived and out to dinner. On the way, she wanted to buy some clothes and dragged me into a Kensington boutique. She tried on the tightest clothing (everything would be tight with her chest inside) and obviously braless, which she modelled in the shop soliciting opinions. It was an amusing and potentially embarrassing situation had one of my respectable neighbours come in. Anyway the sales staff had a giggle!

for links to photos of this astonishing creature!

Peter

Re: Alexis Silver - surely not implants!

Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 6:54 am
by TonyJ
theres a bit of a difference in enhancing and implants... not just semantically, without wanting to sound like an arse :)

when someone says a lass has had implants you instantly think of freakish 'airbags' like Lolo Ferrari and Minka, or more modest (when compared with Lolo and Minka) but obvious implants like Sara Jay or Shyla Stylez..

my mates Mrs had her already considerable bust 'enhanced' to prevent in her words 'droopage' and I swear to god you would never tell they'd been done.

Admittedly they did cost 8.5k - not exactly cheap - so they were good 'uns :)

I'd be very surprised tho if this Alexis lass has had hers done IMHO

Re: Angelique and Minka

Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 8:41 am
by jj
Hasn''t M gone for a further few inches recently? I'm sure I saw
something on the 'box recently.
And elsewhere in ths thread it seems that Alexis has 'done the
deed'- I haven't watched any of her recent stuff.


Re: Alexis Silver - surely not implants!

Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 8:43 am
by jj
TonyJ wrote:
> theres a bit of a difference in enhancing and implants... not
> just semantically,

Well for a start, 'enhancement' has the connotation of improvement,
which is often very much a matter of opinion.


Re: Alexis Silver - surely not implants!

Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 4:42 am
by johnsmith09
"enhanced" is just a polite term for implants and besides im struggling to think of ways you could "enhance" breasts without adding implants within them
but back to the author of this thread, how could you not tell?

Re: Alexis Silver - surely not implants!

Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:56 pm
by Mr Mark
Having had the opportunity to soap said breasts in the shower for Spuffco, I can definitely tell you they're not fake!


Re: Alexis Silver - surely not implants!

Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:05 pm
by jj
Spuffco !!!
Brilliant name- had me in stitches for ages, that.
Shagtastic !