Re: Questions for the admin
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 3:59 pm
It's essentially a data-processing problem; too much info, and too diffuse.
Iafd has already hit the buffers with web-only content and AFAIK decided to ban
it altogether. Unless bgafd takes on 100 staffers they can't cope.
And there's a degree of 'commercialism' to listing website data.... as in your
comment about older material. It's the database's aim only to list the original
titles- and for consumers to find them; that's what Google's for. For newer
[web-based] material, I don't know what the eventual solution will be. It may be
that, like the US, ahem, 'escorts' or erotic dancers who do the occasional porno
to 'keep their profile up', Brit girls will have to do the occasional DVD to make
punters aware of the web-stuff : -)
While purchase-links are supplied where known, they quickly become obsolete-
many [especially on egafd] are now dead. Sponsor-sites are the exception in all
this, of course : -)
Iafd has already hit the buffers with web-only content and AFAIK decided to ban
it altogether. Unless bgafd takes on 100 staffers they can't cope.
And there's a degree of 'commercialism' to listing website data.... as in your
comment about older material. It's the database's aim only to list the original
titles- and for consumers to find them; that's what Google's for. For newer
[web-based] material, I don't know what the eventual solution will be. It may be
that, like the US, ahem, 'escorts' or erotic dancers who do the occasional porno
to 'keep their profile up', Brit girls will have to do the occasional DVD to make
punters aware of the web-stuff : -)
While purchase-links are supplied where known, they quickly become obsolete-
many [especially on egafd] are now dead. Sponsor-sites are the exception in all
this, of course : -)