egafd.com

If you really wanted to use your imagination and fantasize you probably wouldnt have much need for porn in the first place

one eyed jack wrote:

> Erm...It looks like a woman sucking a cock to me in that pic
> but ok.
>
> It does reinforce my opinion shared a while back that porn has
> to have that element of sleaze, I dont think its fantasy at all
> as Ive heard this comment levelled at established models over
> the years who work with their partners.
>
> I would rather watch a woman doing it with someone who she
> actually likes/fancies/ cares about or loves. The real fantasy
> would be imagining myself in place of the guy receiving that
> sexual pleasure
>
> I guess part of the wankers fantasy is seeing a beautiful woman
> "destroyed" and in pain because she deserves it for being of
> loose morals perhaps.
>
> Each to their own. My way works for me and has been for over 10
> years now
>
>


As you say each to their own, what floats their boat and their perfect (fantasy) girl both in terms of appearance and personality.

For me anything to do with destroying a girl emotionally and / or her being in pain physically is a total turn off.

Rather my perfect girl wants to do what she is doing and is enjoying it regardless of what others might think hence she becomes sexually turned on as well as pleasuring me.

Rather my perfect girl wants to do what she is doing and is enjoying it regardless of what others might think hence she becomes sexually turned on as well as pleasuring me.

Oh in that case then she'd rather be having a nice glass of wine and reading a good novel then. Not sure the rest would fall into place from this

Ha ha I know what you mean but couldnt resist...!happy!

one eyed jack wrote:

.................

> Oh in that case then she'd rather be having a nice glass of
> wine and reading a good novel then

.................

but then she wouldn't be my perfect girl! !wink!

@Jack: I expected you to respond in defense of your work after all you have a vested interest in doing so however that very interest compromises whatever argument you put to the contrary.
I'm also offended with your inference of me and others like myself wishing to see a "seeing a beautiful woman "destroyed" and in pain because she deserves it for being of loose morals perhaps" - because that can only be the alternative to what your offering isn't it?

Jack, I've chosen to ignore your stream of digs, but it seems you don't know where to stop. So since you want a response, here it is

'Surely seeing her with her man is good enough' - my affair, my decision alone.

'I can understand that criticism Emac' - it was not a criticism, just an observation, expressing my preference.

'I guess part of the wankers fantasy is seeing a beautiful woman "destroyed" and in pain because she deserves it for being of loose morals perhaps'. - what a moronic observation. How is the opposite of a film of a woman having sex with her partner seeing a woman 'destroyed'??? How warped!

You then ironically say each to their own. Nobody has told you not to do what you like. People have their own preferences and they've been expressed here.

Now, how about getting back to the subject in hand?

This is how I see it. You have the right to comment. I have the right to respond. You dont like my response and counteract it with your own. Thats generally how forums work

Given the track record of opinions of those who equate aggressive stronger sex as more superior to vanilla/ boring sex I don't think my observations were moronic at all considering they are based on the various comments that people dont see couples doing it as porn and would rather see a woman with a man she is not involved with personally whereas I dont see what difference it makes

You gave up the right to lecture others on forum etiquette when you displayed such little regard for it yourself. Referring to rival posters as 'wankers' and smearing them as misogynists are just two examples.
So once again in your estimation anyone who expresses even a mild dislike to a scene involving an actual couple and one that just happens to be produced by you is a masochistic misogynist?

My post above was directed to Jack

I'm not aware I gave up any rights on forum etiquette if my rights are infringed with criticisms I cannot respond back to.

It seems that you infer that my kind of porn kills any fantasy of the viewer seeing her with her partner.

How so?