Why Big Jim, why?

[jj]

Laughing meself silly at image of Robin Cook, crown askew on his head, up to his arse in water on Brighton sea-front.
Perhaps Jo Moore could be brought back from retirement to (metaphorically) bury the Q Mum (God Bless Her).
If Jo M's looking for work, she might try 'modelling'..........

[richard]

Have to agree about pushing the bounderies! You now quite commonly see the sucking of the cock through the white pants, focus on the silhouette of the girl sucking/ wanking a cock, dildo action, mouth to pussy, cock in pussy at different angle, cum on the face etc in programmes such as Uniforms, Sandy babe abroad, A-levels and class action etc.
keep pushing those boundaries big Jim!

[crofter]

I have to disagree with the idea that TAC and Televisionx are bringing in Fresh Talent to the Hardcore Industry, Is it possible that it is in fact holding back the hardcore scene, because girls can make good money shooting softcore and can be kept a lot more busy than they could in h/c. Although with regard to the World Cup, come on ARGENTINA, dont let the jocks down!!

[Dunk Starr]

It's not so much fresh talent, but sustaining a british hardcore market. With sex shops paying low, and of course limited outlets; without the subscription channels, the only productions would be Ben Dover, as it stands, it gives people like BJ, viv thomas, Paul A (makes uniforms/panties)and myself, the chance to make broadcast material, and hardcore. Again without TV, half of these people would have no revenue source to warrant h/c production.
As far as girls making good money shooting s/c over h/c, the price is effectively the same and when shooting soft, good producers will take soft and hard. I think crofter is insinuating that if you pay for soft, everything must be simulated, not so, just because you are not seeing penetration, for example, doesn't mean it's not going on.
Without TVX & TAC alowing us to experiment with english flavoured porn, means that we don't end up in jail on a trumped up morality charge.