Page 2 of 2

Re: Carol Vorderman

Posted: Sun May 04, 2003 5:18 am
by steve56
she looks scared in the 1st one almost as if shes trying not to fart?

Q. for Magoo (legal expert)

Posted: Sun May 04, 2003 5:36 am
by Mart
I assume anyone being discussed here could lodge some sort of legal objection. Although they would be risking public exposure of pervy fantasies about them. Not that I want to get anyone worried...hehe

Mart

Re: Carol Vorderman

Posted: Sun May 04, 2003 6:47 am
by Cheeky Chappie
Don't worry guys ..... I'm not knocking Carol, each to their own I suppose. (CC thinks to himself after typing that - 'still don't get it though, Carol Vorderman?')


Re: Carol Vorderman

Posted: Sun May 04, 2003 7:38 am
by Jon
I remember seeing her years ago on a kid's tv programme. She was sitting on the floor talking to someone. When she got up she flashed her knickers to the camera. But:

a) She was wearing tights
b) Her nicks were plain white
c) She had thick thighs (back then)

Still, nice to see....

Re: Carol Vorderman

Posted: Sun May 04, 2003 9:47 am
by steve56
were the knicks see-through?

Re: Q. for Magoo (legal expert)

Posted: Sun May 04, 2003 11:33 am
by Mart
Either Magoo has been taken away or he's not talking to me. Can there be any other explanation?

Mart

Re: Q. for Magoo (legal expert)

Posted: Sun May 04, 2003 1:08 pm
by magoo
Sorry Mart I didnt get out of bed until 3 pm.

In answer to your Q. Its not as if anyone has said anything libelous. If someone were to post that a celeb was once prosecuted for having sex with a large german shepherd dog called Max then I expect legal issues might be a worry. But to take action for libel the allegations have to be beleivable and likely to damage the reputation. So if I posted that a famous footballer was bent for example it would not be actionable because "the man on the Clapham omnibus" (I think Lord Denning said that) could not be reasonably be expected to beleive it and whats more it would not damage his reputation. If I said he took bribes to fix matches then that would be different especially if I passed it off as a well sourced bit of fact like the tabloids tend to do.

I guess merely being the object of pervy fantasies by a bunch of porn anoraks is not really likely to cause her career any damage. And I am sure if Carol emailed the mods saying "get those filthy pictures removed or else I am sending Richard "twice nightly" Whiteley round to hit you" they would quake in their boots and comply with her request. The internet is full of celeb picture including fakes which often unfairly depict celebs doing sexual acts which never happened. I am sure Britney Spears has never been DPd by Mr Marcus and Lexington Steel but theres fake pics of that out there on the net.

And whats more I have the documents to prove it!

Re: Carol Vorderman

Posted: Sun May 04, 2003 5:08 pm
by Mart
Yes, Carol Vorderman. Not least because she looks very much like Linda Leigh - Phrowoar!!

Mart

Re: Carol Vorderman

Posted: Sun May 04, 2003 5:19 pm
by steve56
i bet that richard would not mind having 2 from the top

Re: Q. for Magoo (legal expert)

Posted: Sun May 04, 2003 5:19 pm
by magoo
Either Marts gone away or he isnt talking to me! :-)