Page 2 of 3
Re: the stones vs the who
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2003 11:12 pm
by buttsie
Both have produced masses of memorable songs
Jagger or Daltrey
Like trying to split hairs-impossible
cheers
B....OZ
supergroups
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2003 9:28 am
by steve56
blind faith ,king crimson,ELP,cream,were all supergroups they were ok.
Re: the stones vs the who
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2003 10:19 am
by michael jackass
i reckon the stones could outnumber the who in a scrap but roger daltry looks like he can handle himself even tho he is a shortarse , townsend could do one of his karate chop guitar chords and finish off the stones anyday . they are only lucky moonies not around cos he would papdiddle the asses chahmo mutha f@@ka eeee heeeee ow.
Re: the stones vs the who
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2003 10:22 am
by steve56
bill wymans quite hard too ive heard!!!
Re: the stones vs the who
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2003 10:32 am
by the duke
for me the who win by a short nose
which band did the most drugs?
Re: the stones vs the who
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2003 10:34 am
by steve56
stones im sure.
Re: the stones vs the who
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2003 10:43 am
by the duke
moon townsend and entwhistle put away a fair amount of gear as well
Re: the stones vs the who
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2003 10:46 am
by steve56
who smashed the most hotels?gotta be the who???,townshend was on heroin i recall now he got off that but became an alcholic.
Re: the stones vs the who
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2003 10:47 am
by the duke
a method not reckomended by the priory
Re: the stones vs the who
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2003 11:09 am
by steve56
think ill start a thread bout the small faces tomorrow that should be interesting only had 1 no 1 in 66 with all or nothing.