Page 2 of 4
Re: deletion of earlier posts
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 6:03 pm
by Ace
Reminds me of the Neil and Christine Hamilton case. Like or loathe them, they didn't deserve those allegations, and it was right the accuser was named and subsequently jailed
Re: deletion of earlier posts
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 6:08 pm
by Eric
I see your point Ace, but don't you think that the Hamilton's kind of act like any publicity is good publicity? I'm not trying to take anything away from your arguement.
Re: deletion of earlier posts
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 6:14 pm
by Ace
Oh they do milk it and are very good as being portrayed as victims, but regardless of Neils' dodgy political career with cash for questions and his laughable effort at trying to sue Al Fayed, they do pale into insignificance with the story of him and his wife being accused of what they were supposed to have done
Re: John Leslie and Ulrika Jonsson
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 6:39 pm
by The Last Word
After the genuine sincerity of his statement only those who purposely disliked him anyway will hold this against him, and his career will probably find a solid second wind. He'll do okay - and I'd like to see just how that disgusting turd Matthew Wright is going to squirm his way out of this one.
By the way, Ace, when your ex caught you 'banging one out' over Ulrika's weather report I hope it was at home, and not, say, outside Dixons.
The Last Word
Re: John Leslie and Ulrika Jonsson
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 6:43 pm
by Lizard
Yes! good point LW, banging one off outside comet,s not too good for your image........
Re: deletion of earlier posts
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 7:28 pm
by Tez
Duz that mean i can write it again now?
Re: John Leslie and Ulrika Jonsson
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 7:40 pm
by marcusallen
It is well known that I hate "The Press"
This is a case in point and Ms Johnson is a total,utter piece of shit in my book. She will do Anything to court publicity.
"Kiss and Sell" has always been abhorrent to me but fascinating to the public at large.-Such is human nature, HOWEVER,
To be accused of a sex crime is a deadly serious thing. IF proven then the offender should receive serious punishment (covered before).
But, in this case, it was not ever "rape" or "abusing a minor" etc. etc. it was one ego against another. Leslie may well have fucked her, or slid his hand up her skirt, or pulled out his dick and had a wank-who knows. BUT, it had to be with her compliance and being the media slag that she is, she did not bail him out, just milked the press/money.
Because of our legal system, (which in many ways is a total joke) she cannot be nicked for her actions.
Re: deletion of earlier posts
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 7:44 pm
by alec
Yes.
Re: John Leslie and Ulrika Jonsson
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2003 5:06 am
by Eric
And Matthew wright was meant to be his friend!
Re: John Leslie and Ulrika Jonsson
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2003 5:18 am
by steve56
cant stand the man,wasnt he the 1 that said david souls play was crap and it turned out he hadnt seen it,dave won the case.