Page 2 of 3

Re: Color Climax on EGAFD

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:58 pm
by mart
It's standard practice in terrain like that to climb to the top of a few peaks.....lol

Mart


Re: Color Climax on EGAFD

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 5:07 am
by jj
Hitler's Alsatian- used as the (unwilling) guinea-pig for the cyanide capsules subsequently taken by the humans.
One of the most horrible episodes of the War that, Goebbel's children being murdered that way- reminds me somewhat of the pharaonic rite, killing others to ease the pain of one's own death. Truly decadent.

Re: Color Climax on EGAFD

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 10:58 am
by jj
.
The term Alsatian reflects its true origin rather than allowing the Germans to claim the breed as their own.


Re: Color Climax on EGAFD

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 12:39 pm
by Ace
Some of the covers actually state the actresses appearing, if you can read Danish, albeit there first name only.


Re: Color Climax on EGAFD

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 5:34 pm
by bfu
so that makes them french sheppards

lol

Re: Color Climax on EGAFD

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 5:38 pm
by alec
And you believe them?

Seriously, if you spot the same name and the same girl in two loops in two compilations, then we might be getting somewhere - at least to an alias used more than once. But I suspect these names were invented ten years later, when the compilations were made, by whoever designed the covers and for appearance's sake.

If there were 72 hours in the day, I'd start doing caps and putting those who appeared in more than one loop in the unknowns, but as I said, it's more productive to start with films where there's some chance of putting names to faces, because there were sometimes correct credits, e.g. 70s French films and 70s Danish films (rather than loops, like the 'In the Sign of' series). In due time we can work outwards from there.

Re: Color Climax on EGAFD

Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2004 4:32 am
by jj
......which is why I was careful to say 'true origins' rather than 'Alsace'.
I had it that the breed originated in Central Europe (possibly Germany, probably Prussia, which at least partly overlapped) and was defined formally in the mid-1800s.
All that I know for sure is that it's an aureus dog (i.e. jackal-
descended), as defined by Konrad Lorenz, rather than (as you might think) wolf-descended lupus-dog: there's a fascinating essay here: about doggy symbolism and the Nazis, BTW..........