Page 2 of 2
Re: Oscar Nominations
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2004 10:36 am
by bfu
the system to choose, likes as independant as the hutton report farce
money before integrety
WFT happened to girl with the perl earing??
Re: Oscar Nominations
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2004 1:50 pm
by jj
That's part of the reason for my cynicism, but by far the biggest is my distaste for granting these often only mediocrely-talented people even more 'celebrity'.
They have millions of reasons to feel loved and appreciated sitting in their bank-accounts- I really don't want to hear about a badly-staged love-fest in addition.
Re: Oscar Nominations
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2004 1:54 pm
by jj
Great painting, lousy film.
One of Monty Python's 'small ads', in the Big Red Bok:
"For sale: Small brown and green thing. Could be a Vermeer".
Anyway, Van Eyck was better........
Re: Oscar Nominations
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2004 5:27 pm
by Terry May
'The girl with a pearl earring' has done so well at the box office they're making a sequel. Yes it's 'The girl with a pearl necklace'!
I theng yow!
Re: Oscar Nominations
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2004 5:32 pm
by jj
.
That'll be ?10.50, please.
Kerrr-ching !!!
Re: Oscar Nominations
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2004 6:19 pm
by Terry May
cheques in the post
Re: Oscar Nominations
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2004 6:54 pm
by jj
Now, if I had a cheque for every time I'd heard THAT one...........