Page 2 of 3

Re: Linsey dawn mckenzie video

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2002 7:48 pm
by pervy pete
and another thing - I thought this Forum was for exchanging views, ideas, opinions, finding information, etc and NOT as an Exchange & Mart of what is likely to be illegal goods!

Am I right, or am I right?

Re: Linsey dawn mckenzie video

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2002 8:01 pm
by Riddle
Talking about being ripped off, what about all the so called hardcore videos that turn out to be shite.
so copyright my arse, if they mislead with advertising i say fuck em.

Re: Linsey dawn mckenzie video

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2002 8:04 pm
by marcusallen
You are referring to the "major" chain sex shops et al. The LDM was made by an emminently respectable producer and advertised for exactly what it was.

Re: Linsey dawn mckenzie video

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2002 8:10 pm
by Riddle
Yeah i was talking about the rip off merchants like liquid gold, not genuine productions. sorry should have made that clear.

Re: Linsey dawn mckenzie video

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2002 8:25 pm
by pervy pete
The old expression "let the buyer beware" springs to mind! If you don't buy carefully (whether it's a video or a house) you shouldn't blame anyone but yourself. Specially as this Forum will help you make a choice of title or supplier. If you buy "shite", it's probably your own fault - take it up with your supplier. If he has falsly described the goods, go and see Trading Standards. If you bought "under the counter", you took a calculated risk. This Forum is surely not a dumping ground for the "shite" you bought carelessly! Generally in life, if you deal honestly with honest suppliers you should both be happy. Those suppliers who routinely sell shite will soon enough, get their houses burnt down!

Here endeth the third lesson.

Luv and kisses (if you deserve them) - fire and brimstone if you don't

Re: Linsey dawn mckenzie video

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2002 8:27 pm
by jj:
No, no, this is just misunderstood semantics: I have a COPY of War and Peace, but it's a Penguin Classic paperback, not a facsimile of Tolstoy's original manuscript.
And if I want to sell it, it's perfectly legal.

Re: Linsey dawn mckenzie video

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2002 9:54 pm
by alec
pervy pete wrote:
>
> If it's a genuine tape he's selling, that's a minor offence
> (still an offence),

It may be an offence in the case of a porn tape as he is not a licensed sex shop, but it is not an offence against copyright. I've not heard of hundreds of outraged authors blockading Hay-on-Wye because they sell second hand books there.

Re: Linsey dawn mckenzie video

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2002 3:57 am
by Daz
Surely if the guy was duping the LDM tape he would have written - "I CAN SUPPLY COPIES OF" instead of offering the one movie. I understand the implication of breaking copyright and agree with some of the above posts, however, hundreds of original movies gets bought or exchanged via this forum, so why all the hassle over this ONE tape???

Re: Linsey dawn mckenzie video

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2002 7:05 am
by jj:
Full Moon last night perhaps?

Re: Linsey dawn mckenzie video

Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2002 4:34 am
by bazza
message for pervy pete,before you go mouthing off how about getting the facts,it was an original which i bought,i have since bought the dvd and no longer needed the video,