Page 2 of 3
Re: House of Horror
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2004 1:46 pm
by steve56
it was when dept s was going strong there was a episode called last train to redbridge i sarcasticly made my own up:last train to latimer road,lol.
Re: House of Horror
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2004 2:10 pm
by jj
Wouldn't bother me in the slightest- especially if I'd got a few quid off.
Superstitious claptrap.
Re: House of Horror
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2004 2:50 pm
by IdolDroog
I do still stand by my first post, but yeh Im inclined to agree to an extent; if the house seemed ok then it wouldnt bother me too much - if it felt a bit dark and wrong somehow then id get the fuck out. Someone probably died in most houses over a 100 years old at some point, I guess the implication of murder is that the evil "may still linger" or something
Re: House of Horror
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2004 2:55 pm
by steve56
or a blithe spirit?
Re: House of Horror
Posted: Sun Feb 29, 2004 1:23 pm
by jj
True, given that you have to LIVE in the place......
......you might get a bad vibe for no reason at all, even from a house that had merely been occupied by two nice old ladies who only ever kept bunny-rabbits, and knitted overcoats for tortoises.........
Re: House of Horror
Posted: Sun Feb 29, 2004 1:26 pm
by steve56
and made elderberry wine on the side,lol.
Re: House of Horror
Posted: Sun Feb 29, 2004 1:44 pm
by jj
Ah, so you know Madge and Mavis as well?
Re: House of Horror
Posted: Sun Feb 29, 2004 1:46 pm
by steve56
homicide and old lace wasnt it?,lol.
Re: House of Horror
Posted: Sun Feb 29, 2004 2:02 pm
by Boo2
IdolDroog wrote:
> I guess the implication of murder is
> that the evil "may still linger" or something
It?s the something that would concern me. Weren?t there body parts buried in this house? Imagine doing a bit of DIY?ing... ?Ahh, what have I uncovered here? An old Victorian marble fireplace maybe?? ...No, someone?s thigh-bone.
Re: House of Horror
Posted: Sun Feb 29, 2004 2:06 pm
by jj
....less of a shock if you were aware of the house's history, than otherwise.
The 'legal opinions' aired on TV last night seem not to have considered this aspect.