Re: charlotte church vs lysette anthony
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2004 2:03 pm
But mostly about Charlotte...
I was going to post this in the main fourm, as I was going open the debate out further, but as there this topic has been started.. However if someone wants to move it across if you think the point I'm making is relevant then please do.
The Church story goes that shes been offered ?1mill to pose starkers for a (quote) 'adult tv channel' and that her people are 'seriously considering' the offer. It was reported in the Daily Star (adult tv channel = TVX?) and Sky News Active/ and on the website on Thursday.
Now whilst I welcome the news - I'm not getting my dick stiff in anticipation just yet, as the main grinder of the story is that 'her people' are going to make the decision whether she disrobes, rather than Charlie herself.
So, why am I pleased that an offer has been made (and not just cus she's a damm attractive young lady, and judging by her recent bikini holiday photos is hiding a cracking pair of 'bells' near the top of the Church tower) as it's the first occasion in ages that someone has made an high money offer to a English celeb like this - And here's the wider question...
If you are a fan of female celb tits and muff, in the last couple of years you've had to make to with paperatzzi beach shots in the tabs for the boobs, and Uncle Hef's organ for some beaver.
So just what have mags brit mags like Mayfair or Penthouse got against whipping out the chequebook offering a 6-7 figure sum and asking a britbabe (non model or porn actress) to flash the gash?
As someone said in an earlier posting she prob turn this one down, and wait a few years, but I really do hope us fellas get the chance to inspect the parish Church bush soon...
I was going to post this in the main fourm, as I was going open the debate out further, but as there this topic has been started.. However if someone wants to move it across if you think the point I'm making is relevant then please do.
The Church story goes that shes been offered ?1mill to pose starkers for a (quote) 'adult tv channel' and that her people are 'seriously considering' the offer. It was reported in the Daily Star (adult tv channel = TVX?) and Sky News Active/ and on the website on Thursday.
Now whilst I welcome the news - I'm not getting my dick stiff in anticipation just yet, as the main grinder of the story is that 'her people' are going to make the decision whether she disrobes, rather than Charlie herself.
So, why am I pleased that an offer has been made (and not just cus she's a damm attractive young lady, and judging by her recent bikini holiday photos is hiding a cracking pair of 'bells' near the top of the Church tower) as it's the first occasion in ages that someone has made an high money offer to a English celeb like this - And here's the wider question...
If you are a fan of female celb tits and muff, in the last couple of years you've had to make to with paperatzzi beach shots in the tabs for the boobs, and Uncle Hef's organ for some beaver.
So just what have mags brit mags like Mayfair or Penthouse got against whipping out the chequebook offering a 6-7 figure sum and asking a britbabe (non model or porn actress) to flash the gash?
As someone said in an earlier posting she prob turn this one down, and wait a few years, but I really do hope us fellas get the chance to inspect the parish Church bush soon...