Page 2 of 4
Re: Non-porn Girls
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2004 6:51 pm
by jj
It's interesting in this regard (and BCat's experiences are broadly similar to mine) that a French guy has just released a load of archive footage from the 30s and before (as ART, of course.....), and it's wall-to-wall threesomes/animal/nuns/other weird stuff, and obviously all performed by amateurs.
Not sure what, if anything, it proves, but the contention was made but the reporter that the barriers between porn 'genres' didn't exist back then, e.g. you could get a three-way b/b/g where the guys also fucked each other, and while a terrier was licking the girl's pussy. Such stuff nowadays is much more compartmentalised........
Re: Non-porn Girls
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2004 1:02 am
by Number1
Or maybe it's that porn is very much like real sex, but the kind of real sex practiced by a certain few, especially those who have the time and resources to do so to their heart's content. Are we assuming that the scenes from early porn as described above are strictly directed, or did the participants that went off to bottle each other do so because that's what they felt the urge to do.
Admittedly, the girls you find in life willing to go to such lenghts are few enough that the majority of couples in society will not fall into that category, but there will be many that do, and the ones who do will fill their lives with all manner of debauchery and depravity. And presumably the more time and money they have to do so, and the fewer constraints of family and career thay have, the more wild and bizarre it will become.
Don't try to tell me that the producers in the US who film, often from a very hands on position, all the multi-penatrative abusive degradation of girls willing to participate for money, do so for any reason other than they enjoy it. Obviously there will be a lot of people out there who haven't got the stomach to watch it, but it is always the ones who are most passionate about their hobbies that make the most from them financially, as in most other aspects of life.
It is always noticeable to me how turned on some of my younger, less experienced colleagues become when they see things that I got bored of doing years ago. The down side of living a life of debauchery is that you start to run out of things that seem excitingly new.
Re: Non-porn Girls
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2004 7:20 am
by Deuce Bigolo
very true Magoo but it goes further than Anal depending on which generation you were born into
My parents born 1942/1943 haven't gotten round to doggie yet
Something about respect...maybe if they changed the name...who knows?
Did the church do a number on them
cheers
B....OZ
Re: Non-porn Girls
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2004 2:20 pm
by del boy
how do you know this?
Re: Non-porn Girls
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2004 4:53 pm
by IdolDroog
oh god please tell me you dont have THAT conversation with your parents :S however old you might be thats wrong!
Re: Non-porn Girls
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2004 5:39 pm
by Pervert
"So, anyway, Dad, when you were taking Mum up the arse . . . ."
No, I can't forsee any circumstances when that conversation could comfortably be had. Shudder.
Re: Non-porn Girls
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2004 5:50 pm
by What?
I think the extremer side of porn has its place. It isnt all about mirroring reality, and a lot of it is for the shock value of seeing people do things that most people would never do. Its like main stream movies in a way... how many of them actually mirror reality? How realistic is Star Wars? Not very, but its still very popular and has its place. Same in porn.