Page 2 of 3

Re: Chavs vs Yobs

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 4:50 pm
by Officer Dibble
On the contrary steve, they can't hold their liquor. Which is why, at weekends, in High streets across the land, we see them cackling, shrieking, and staggering in the road, rolling in the gutter, spewing in doorways, flashing their unimpressive tits and 'thongs' (the Chav birds idea of erotic lingerie) at disinterested passers by and generally being obnoxious.


Officer Dibble

Re: Blunkett Admits 'Chav' Problem

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 7:18 pm
by jj
......I expect much the same fuss was made about the 'drunk for a penny, dead drunk for twopence' gin-brigade in the 18th century.
Or the Victorian workhouse-denizens.
Or serfs.
Or cavemen who lived in very tasteless caves.

Yes, they are unsightly, ill-educated, boorish and generally offensive to decent society, especially since they seem to take a perverse pride in being tasteless and ignorant.
Let's just gas them all, and be done with it, eh?
MUCH easier than reordering society so as to eradicate bad education and worse parenthood, and give them something more to live for than the next Primark catalogue and the new litter of bull-terrier crosses.......

Re: Blunkett Admits 'Chav' Problem

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 8:11 pm
by Lizard
The rt Hon Mr JJ wrote :- Let's just gas them all, and be done with it, eh?

Fucking great idea.............when? and will it mean cheaper petrol, and less congested roads?


Re: Blunkett Admits 'Chav' Problem

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 8:29 pm
by jj
It'a always so nice to see these liberal attitudes where our fellow (sub-)humans are concerned.
Smokers, fatties, who's next? People with unsightly moles on their upper-lips? Those who can't pronounce the letter 'R'? Baptists? Anabaptists?

Re: Blunkett Admits 'Chav' Problem

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 9:45 pm
by Pervert
Gingers!!!

Re: Blunkett Admits 'Chav' Problem

Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 12:37 am
by jj
Of course.
How silly of me.

Re: Blunkett Admits 'Chav' Problem

Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 2:00 am
by mart
People who bang on about Chavs.

Mart


Re: Blunkett Admits 'Chav' Problem

Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 4:09 am
by Fastbike
I have always seen some force to the arguments of the Anabaptists , but would not stand in your way otherwise .


Re: Blunkett Admits 'Chav' Problem

Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 5:30 am
by RetroDon
What's beginning to happen is the beginning of the end.

Here in Hull, a true Chav town (though I reside in nearby East Yorkshire which compares favourably with anywhere, including Cheshire and Surrey) we have CCTV cameras everywhere. Not just in the town centre, but everywhere. Even on quiet, leafy corners. They are there "for our own protection", of course, not to monitor everything and everywhere we go (oh no). Why are they there? Chavs! Due to the scum breeding like the sewer rats they are, I have to put up with being watched by some wage slave in the city council whenever I venture into the city boundary. Triffic.

Call me paranoid, but I KNOW that this is all part of of a master plan on "law and order" and we'll come to realise in the coming years that Orwell was bang-on. Blair and the blindman are practically saying so now, that due to the mass influx of chavs/tegs/pogs we are facing a "necessary" clampdown regarding "law and order". It's all part of the drive to stop people thinking for themselves... I didn't allow this "permissive society" to thrive, it has nothing to do with me, and yet, mark my words, it won't just be the scum we are discussing that pay the price of yet more of our natural rights (privavcy, free speech, free thinking) being eroded, it will be ALL OF US, all in the name of a greater "society"...

Me, personally, I f**king hate chavs, vehemently so for the above reason, and also for the fact that the things they get handed to them on a plate (Fresh new estates, gardens, mobility cars, etc etc) they just wreck, like the wastes of space they are. Of course, most of the councillors that ripped up the green fields and gave the chavs these now run-down estates are just jumped-up "Chief chavs" themselves.
The problems in todays society are manyfold, and far too deep to discuss here, but for my own protection I'd like to see compulsory sterilising of all female chavs at 12 years of age in order to stop the plague of rats. Highly Unlikely, more's the pity.
No, here we go, the attac on chavs by the curent fascist regime will be an attack on all of us, because it suits them in their quest of maximum control.

Re: Blunkett Admits 'Chav' Problem

Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 6:12 am
by Fastbike
Retrodon, you could ,in fact should , join Liberty .
http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/
They have had Blunketts number for some time .
I'm a member and I suggest that everyone on this forum who wants to buy/make/sell porn should be as well.
They do challenge decisions that would throw Asylum Seekers out and that would p*ss off some forumites ,but it's right that someone does this when the Govt is acting illegally
The more who join the more money available to take action , and the greater democratic mandate they have .