Page 2 of 2
Re: Football rant..
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 12:49 am
by big red
It's all perms and earings! Bunch of coke snorting spit roasting rapo retards.
Tell me where would that numpty Beckham earn more than ?150 a week if it wasn't for football? And people get stabbed to death over it, bunch of dim-witted, jingoistic, prol, arse.
Re: Football rant..
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:55 am
by Spook
In an attempt to defend the much maligned Sky Sports punter.
Sky's coverage of cricket and rugbies union and league is excellent.
I'm an armchair footie fan (bar the odd trip to watch the mighty Orient) - but I'm fed-up with the premier league overload on Sky and can't remember the last time I sat down to watch a match all the way through.
If there was a way to stop paying Sky for keeping third rate footballers the favoured customers of local Ferrari dealers then I'd gladly do so. But they don't have a dedicated footie channel - and if you want to watch other sports, you've got to send the cash to Sky in the unwelcome knowledge that the vast majority of your subscription is funding the football gravy train.
Re: Football rant..
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 9:36 am
by eduardo
I have been to both Champions League games (and the qualifier) this season but I do so because I can't get tickets for the weekend home games which are like gold dust.
Therefore if I want to travel up from Exeter then I have to take what I can and I will therefore put up with the cost for 3-4 times a season.
What makes me laugh is that the Qualifier against AK Graz attracted more supporters than the actual Group games and it's for the simple reason that tickets were ?17 and therefore more affordable than the ?30 for group games.
Surely someone that runs the club can twig onto this?