Page 2 of 2
Re: the royal wedding.
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 11:48 am
by Pervert
Each to their own, Dan.
Rather unfair on the couple themselves, but there'd probably be more public excitement if the bride and groom were 30 years younger.
Re: the royal wedding.
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2005 5:04 pm
by Marblehead Johnson
The Grand National Has been moved back..presumably so that Camilla can still run in it..LOL
Re: the royal wedding.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:58 am
by spider
Be funny now if they scheduled Prince Rainer's funeral for Saturday and Charlie had to postpone again !
Re: the royal wedding.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:51 am
by Dan Brusca
He may have been the longest reigning monarch in Europe, but his country only has about 36,000 people in it, so it's not really that big a deal in the scheme of things.
As for Saul Bellow, I bet at least 99% of people have never heard if him.