egafd.com

The Officer is on the money once again. I am curious as to wether or not there is a correlation between the dawn of the "Purve" and the emergence of all this extreme shit such as the wide open asshole resembling something from a butcher's shop window, the legal kiddie porn and such delights as the close up of some chav bird swirling a recently deposited load of jizz around her gob.

Could it be that the "Purves" (An image always comes to mind of a fifty year old chap in a seedy flat for some reason and he sports a ponytail despite being bald on top.) are bereft of any flair and so totally inept technically that they can only produce this "Shocking" stuff as they have no style whatsoever?

Who knows? Who cares?

Rudeboy,
Under the Video Recordings Act any person under the age of 18 is a "child" for the purpose of English Law. Anyone over the age of 18 is an adult. There is no such thing as "legal kiddie porn" or would you favour bringing in even more censorship?
Mike Freeman.

"There is no such thing as "legal kiddie porn" or would you favour bringing in even more censorship?"

I'd have no problem with that at all.

If you support censorship of images featuring consenting adults then you are one of the enemy.
Mike Freeman

Brerbear,

I am anti-censorship, I use my own name. I have gone to prison for my views in the past what more do you want? I am the UK's veteran pornographer. !confused!
Mike Freeman

The enemy? Hardly. What I have a big problem with is this fixation with making legal models look underage as per magazines like Barely Legal and the loathesome "Tight." In my opinion it is designed to appeal to paedos, kiddie-fiddlers and wrongcocks, the very lowest of the low.

I could quite happily spend the rest of my life doing fuck all else but looking at pictures of Nikky Blond and Silvia Saint so I'm hardly anti-porn, only when it is nonce material.