egafd.com

randyandy wrote:


> dynatech you know the answer to your underage for what and to
> whom question so you don't need me to tell you.
>
> All I would ask is if 16's are acceptable to you why not 15,
> 13, 10, 6 etc I know they probably are but that's the reason
> for the age limit in this case.

That statement, as well as being foolhardy, is grossly offensive to myself and is completely out of order as well as being wrong. You confuse having a balanced point of view, one that doesn't match your own, with some kind of condoning of underage sex which is clearly not the case. Furthermore, your statement "if 16's are acceptable to you why not 15, 13, 10, 6 etc I know that they probably are" is as inaccurate as it is foolish. If you cannot differentiate between the point when a girl becomes a woman (and we are talking physically not mentally - use your blessed law as a guide on that one) - and your statement suggests that you see no difference between the ages you quoted above, then perhaps you should deal with those issues. To suggest that enjoying looking at a 17 yr old girls tits make a guy a paedophile means you really have swallowed society's lies hook, line & sinker.
And just for the record, I enjoy WOMEN of all ages, no girls thanks.

Officer,

It is perfectly natural for males of all ages to sexually desire teenage girls. It is biological programming in older males who can still reproduce to do so and that is why some men become more attractive as they get older.
Pornographers can destroy these socially consructed taboos by featuring virile older men with much younger females and vice-versa. Let people do what they want with their own bodies for they are sovereign.!cool!

Mike Freeman

Do you really think raising the age will stop kids having sex?

Mart

Randy,
The birthrate is falling and soon there wont be enough workers to pay for your pension. All those kids grow up into wage earners and their taxes will support you in your old age!
Mike Freeman.

I am afraid your view of a balanced point of view isn't my own dynatech.

As usual you have used the for underage pics brigades argument and as usual muddled my point.

I didn't really expect anything else to be honest and in a way I am sorry that I've caused you offence.

Read what I wrote again Mart

In view of why you left the UK for Mike your expert opinion should be welcomed however in the view of the reason why you left the UK I don't really have any comment to make for the reasons I gave in my previous post.

Sorry

"The birthrate is falling and soon there wont be enough workers to pay for your pension."

Mike, land in the UK is running out and pretty soon, if government and councils continue to follow the policies instituted by 'Two Shags Prescott' (of building Barrett apartments on any and every available plot of land), there won't be enough room to swing the proverbial cat. These islands are already overpopulated and we are beginning to see problems developing in supplying essential natural resources, like water, to areas of the densely populated south eastern region. But those soft New Labour twats want to compound the problem by squeezing ever more people in to flimsy, rabbit hutch sized, dwellings in the southeast. Maybe they think these new people will pay our pensions in years to come? But hey, whose going to pay their fucking pensions when they reach retirement age? Will the government of the day then have to invite a few million more unsuitable immigrants to come and live here to keep up the ratio of four workers to every pensioner? And where will they live, what water will they drink, who will pay their pensions? It?s all bollocks.

An Englishman?s home is supposed to be his castle. I?m not advocating that he should therefore be entitled to a moat, but he should at the very least have a bit of private space round it, like a decent freakin? garden where he can chill out, have a barbie, and where his kids can play safely. Hey, the next time you?re stuck in traffic just have a look round and imagine how much more freely things might move if 30% of all those people and vehicles were not there. Imagine how much less stressful and agreeable it would be. The falling birth rate is a good thing, we need more space or we will start tearing chunks out of each other like rats in a cage ?we can already see the beginnings of this in phenomena like ?road rage? and the increased levels of anti-social behaviour. The economics of the pension time bomb are a huge problem, but cramming yet more people into these isles is just doo-lally, it will make our lives ever more intolerable and restrictive. The economics of the issue should be addressed by making the output of Britain?s workers of a very high value, so that fewer workers can generate more money. This means focusing on hi-tech creative industries and services and a high calibre of person to man them. That is the only way forward for Britain, China is the workshop of the world now, we don?t need any low skill production line widget assemblers (or benefit claimants).


?All those kids grow up into wage earners and their taxes will support you in your old age!?

I beg to differ, Mike. All the kids we are talking about will grove up to be benefit dependent chavs like their stupid teenage mothers. They won?t be paying no freakin? tax, it will be suckers like you who have to pay tax to support them! Not only that, but these wanky fuckers will repay your largess by burgling your house, killing your pet cat, riding motorbikes round your garden and working you over for the few quid in your wallet in order to buy a few cans of ?White Lightning?. But it needn't be like that, Mike. You could take the first step to avoid this ghastly future by simply saying to the government and the local council ?Fuck off, yer New Labour tossers!?


Officer Dibble

"You could take the first step to avoid this ghastly future by simply saying to the government and the local council ?Fuck off, yer New Labour tossers!?"

A simple solution for simple minds.

You remind me of the publican in the last UK town I was living in. He took exception to the pedestrianisation of the street outside his pub. He mounted a campaign against the dreadful Labour council which was responsible for such reprehensible policies. Unfortunately he ended up with egg on his face because he was such a political ignoramus he didn't know the council was Conservative controlled.

Mart

Officer,

There is some truth in what you say and the indigenous population are leaving in their thousands every week and they are importing cheap labour to fill the gap.

I expect that I will be leaving too! I am looking at cheap land in Europe.

There is only one party to vote for the Labcon party or the Conlab party. If you vote Conlab in the next election there is no way that the incoming public schoolboy will reverse the 600 pieces of legislation, that has destroyed civil liberties, that the other public schoolboy has enacted!

They conspire together to dupe the public.

Mike Freeman