egafd.com

Wahey! I'll get my baton out if you promise to do some fiddling. Um, er...orchestral manouevers in the dark or something.

Oh bugger...I've run out of classical music puns.

I'm off to polish my bone.

Talk to you soon gorgeous.

Big Jim x

Sorry to ruin the party, guys, Ms V is delicious and all that....
BUT......., she hasn't/doesn't do h/c, so why is she spamming here?

are you pissed again?

telling the forum that she's appearing in a magazine does not qualify as spam.

valencia has eleven entries on her page. how many does she require to obtain your permission to post?

Hi jj,

I would imagine that Valencia is 'spamming' here because a lot of her fans (who've seen her on TAC) use this forum.

The same would apply to girls such as Chanta Rose and Tamara Noon who've never done h/c boy/girl video but who still have a following / fan base.

As the BGAFD is the only site to encompass / celibrate all of the British girls of filmed adult entertainment, it seems a logical place for the girls to post.

Thankfully this site is versatile enough to deal with all aspects of porno and not just one or two particular niches.

Hope this was of help.

Cheers,

Big Jim

Go James!!
Very polite!

No, I'm not: and I resent the implication.......
AFAIK, I wasn't rude (which YOU certainly were): I was merely enquiring as to how far you can stretch the definition of "adult films".
I have the utmost regard for Ms Zemanova, and wouldn't DREAM of insulting her: BUT, IMHO, she is by no stretch of the imagination an "adult" actress, and therefore I would appreciate any erudite correction(s) from you as to the qualifications for entry herein.

You're 100% right, BJ (if I may call you bb the obvious diminutive.....), as is WG.
Both ladies, as I'think I've said before, are, IMHO, absolutely gorgeous: my (possibly pedantic) interest had been aroused (apart from the obvious) by the question iof "what exactly does one mean by 'adult'"?
Instead of thoughtless abuse (no names, no pack-drill.......), I would have preferred a more reasoned response.......there are/have been occasions when vaguely similar "advertising" posts have been deleted without comment.

section 1.2 of the faq covers it pretty well. as ever, the basis is resolutely non-scientific.

Is that funny? I am very pished.

Errrr.....eh???.....errr. what?