Free porn is illegal

[Jacques]

planeterotica wrote:


> .......or do the stupid cunts we have in goverment
> think they can control the internet.


This to a factor of 10....

[planeterotica]

Jacques wrote:

> planeterotica wrote:
>
>
> > .......or do the stupid cunts we have in goverment
> > think they can control the internet.
>
> Jacques wrote:

> This to a factor of 10....

planeterotica wrote:

The implications of this are far deeper than you think as 60% or more of internet traffic is porn related and most of this being free porn ,so if Blair and his control freak Goverment pass this law they virtually will control the UK part of the internet, as most other traffic is shopping related either auction sites or retailers where credit/debit cards are needed they will have full accesss to what we are all doing ......BIG BROTHER or what. !thumbsdown!

[Sam Slater]

I see both sides...................surprisingly.

A 10 year old boy/girl wouldn't see any pornographic pictures/movies whilst passing a sex shop. For that they'd have to enter, and would be kicked out within seconds.

That same 10 year old boy/girl on the internet can browse these images for as long as mum isn't looking. ANY 10 year old can click 'ENTER' - I PROMISE I AM OVER 18!': and this is a new phenomenon regarding children's access to pornography.

Of course it may be a surgical strike, on pornographers, by the government just using children as their motive, but you cannot deny that any child with internet access can view just about anything and no-one can currently stop them.

[planeterotica]

Sam Slater wrote:

> I see both sides...................surprisingly.
>
> A 10 year old boy/girl wouldn't see any pornographic
> pictures/movies whilst passing a sex shop. For that they'd have
> to enter, and would be kicked out within seconds.
>
> That same 10 year old boy/girl on the internet can browse these
> images for as long as mum isn't looking. ANY 10 year old can
> click 'ENTER' - I PROMISE I AM OVER 18!': and this is a
> new phenomenon regarding children's access to pornography.
>
> Of course it may be a surgical strike, on pornographers, by the
> government just using children as their motive, but you cannot
> deny that any child with internet access can view just about
> anything and no-one can currently stop them.
>
> planeterotica wrote:

This is true Sam, but as i have previousley pointed out the internet is served worldwide, therefore this will only affect U.K. webmasters and free porn will easily be accessible from the majority of webmasters around the world, the little old U.K. being just a little player in the porn industry, therefore what is the point in wasting parliament time in bringing in a law that will have little effect on the free porn available on the internet !thumbsdown!

[Jacques]

This is why there is Safesurf, ICRA, Cybersitter, NetNanny, Cyberpatrol optnet to name just a few. And let's not forget responsible parenting.

However the whole "lets's protect children" argument just does not wash I'm afraid. Williams report 1979, Cumberbatch report in 1990, Kutchinsky, Diamond....and let's not forget 2000 when the BBFC couldn't find any evidence either.

So there are parental controls available and even if children get acces to it there is no quantifialble evidence that the material was liable to 'deprave and corrupt'.

[Jacques]

/autocomplete

[Sam Slater]

Good point Jacques.

Parental controls do not always work though. Even schoolkids can get through to the odd porn site within school! I know, my 9 year old niece accidentally came across a pornographic image on 'Google Images' whilst searching for 'the plague' for some course work at school.

Responsible parenting can help, but you cannot watch children 24 hours a day. I know this because I remember my childhood! Children are experts at going behind their parents' backs!

[planeterotica]

So when you lot were at school did you not pass around a dirty book, or has this got to the case where its, Do as i Say but Dont do as i done