Page 2 of 2
Re: Scum is too good a word
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 8:33 am
by strictlybroadband
warren zevon rip wrote:
> Presumably if they were illegal immigrants they were not let in
> freely at all.
Yeah but from now on all non-white people should be machine-gunned on entry just in case they're illegal immigrants.
Re: Scum is too good a word
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 8:48 am
by Ace
Get off your soap box Warren. Most of the regulars have sussed that you have a hidden agenda to either wind up people or to try and force your irrelevent brand of intellect here, and it shows.......and it stinks.
Re: Scum is too good a word
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:28 am
by strictlybroadband
Ace wrote:
> Get off your soap box Warren. Most of the regulars have sussed
> that you have a hidden agenda to either wind up people or to
> try and force your irrelevent brand of intellect here, and it
> shows.......and it stinks.
Yeah Warren, get your opinions from The Sun like the rest of us!
Re: Scum is too good a word
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 12:19 pm
by Ace
warren zevon rip wrote:
>
> BTW I have been posting here off and on for a fair while now -
> years rather than months,
Well Warren old bean, below is a link to your first post, notice the date, which DOES make you reletively new from approx 18 months.......hardly 'years rather than months'
Re: Scum is too good a word
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 8:15 pm
by zigsuk
Whether she was a policewoman or not the fact remains that, firstly the fucking cunts shouldn't have been here and secondly one of them had also skipped bail after being convicted of several previous offences so shouldn't have been free.
The real tragedy is that they didn't gun down one of the the bleeding heart liberals who welcome such scum with open arms.
Re: Scum is too good a word
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 8:37 am
by strictlybroadband
zigsuk wrote:
> Whether she was a policewoman or not the fact remains that,
> firstly the fucking cunts shouldn't have been here and
> secondly one of them had also skipped bail after being
> convicted of several previous offences so shouldn't have been
> free.
>
> The real tragedy is that they didn't gun down one of the the
> bleeding heart liberals who welcome such scum with open arms.
True, the police shouldn't have let them skip bail. In my direct experience, the police just can't be asked to check people on bail. In a case I was involved with, a man bailed for a serious crime then committed another serious crime while on bail and then police couldn't be asked to do anything about it. They only become "efficient" for the fun stuff, like chasing and arresting people, and they just love it when they get top play with guns. A lot of court cases collapse because there are too many lazy/stupid coppers, as did the case I was involved in.
But other than rant about it, what would you actually have done differently?