egafd.com

Agree with you Rasputin. Recording technology gives musicians too much choice in terms of overdubs etc. Of course it was good for the Beatles because they had exquisite taste and also had ... ideas, but generally why would you need more than say 32 tracks? It encourages musicians to be disciplined, and if you listen to a lot of 60s stuff be it Beatles, Motown, Stax etc the space between the instruments in the mix is as impressive as the playing in its way .. awesome stuff.

MMT and Abbey Road were much better agree with you there just read a few days back what Polythene Pam was alll about.Kinky Sex.Caractacus wrote:

> Rubber Soul, Revolver, The White Album and Abbey Road are
> better albums, but Sergeant Pepper caught a moment in time.
> Apart from Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds and A Day In The Life,
> there's not much to get excited about----and it's also a very
> short album, not much over half an hour in length.

Welcome back warren!!

I'll second that welcome back.

On Pepper, though, not only is it not the best Beatles album, it wasn't the best album released that year. But what I think doesn't matter. Anyone uses the words "classic" and "album" in the same sentence, and most people think of that one.

Now that's Warren's back, has everybody got their spell-check on?

That should be "Now that Warren's back" or "Now that's Warren back"

!teacher!

!laugh!

lol im sorry still really bad about the bedsit jibe!! but glad to see your alive and well chap!!