egafd.com

Please read this.

If you don't like the way the mods here run these forums the simple answer is go and find another one.

I remember reading a report recently that said porn sites were potentially loosing a lot of money by offering free samples which were supposed to give potential members an idea of the content of the site.

The report said that many people just go from site to site, downloading the free samples and not actually joining any one of them.

Looking at the massive amount of free pictures available via the "direct links to thumbnails" part of richards-realm.com, I can see that is certainly possible.

Sorry if this has been commented on before, but it does seem relevant to this thread.

Always good to check before joining whether the site states how often, if at all, the frequency of updates.

I read that only a tiny percentage of sites actually manage to break even in their first six months of operation. Many don't even get that far!!

SpankyMonkey wrote:

>but as i
> said on a previous thread the attitude in brit porn seems to be
> coming from the girls and the producers that we should be
> eternaly graetful for what we have (no matter how crap it is)
> and should suport it regardless. in other words we customers
> are the fucking lottery funds of the porn industry.

During the "bedding in" period the potential customer should be able to discover if the site is crap, or not. Remember, we do not owe the Britporn business a living!

warren zevon rip wrote:

>
> It's a funny old forum where some people can get away with
> semi-racist comments (e.g. reference to miss
> chakrabati/chappatti elsewhere) but others are not allowed to
> express disappointment and advise improvements about actual
> porn sites.

In addition, we are permitted to make clear references to the media coverage given to policitian's, sportperson's, "celebs", etc - but when it comes to making comments on the media coverage of pornstars, then that is deemed unacceptable!