egafd.com

Whilst I deplore the right wing xenophobes at The Mail I find the News of The World and The Sun far more disturbing. At least The Mail are honest and upfront in their distaste for porn. The News Of The World instead choose to pretend to hate porn, randy vicars and any other sort of sexual behaviour whilst they still carry huge full page ads for David Sullivans rip-off mail order empire. Also their disgusting lurid reports on sex crimes are nothing short of pornographic. Hypocrasy of the worst kind. I saw a documentary the other night where a peadophile said that the News of The Worlds lurid reports of sex cases made it the most popular paper in prisons. So whilst the paper claims to despise sexual crime they are in fact a porn mag for peadophiles due to the revolting detail they go into in the reports. I would not wipe my arse on that crappy paper as I think more shit would come off the page than off my arse.

That was my rant for the month of June.

I would certainly agree that the 'Current Bun' and News Of The World are indeed more distasteful than even The Mail. They print stories exposing the sexual wrongdoings of others, then sanctimoniously present their shitty dossiers to the Old Bill. The hypocritical cunts know very well that the punters only buy the rag to read their dirty vicar sex stories, but they pretend they are only doing it for the moral good of the Nation. They are also patronising fuckers. They probably hold editorial meetings with sociologists in attendance to decide how best to talk down to the proletariat in terms they can understand. ? Maybe throw in some terms like football, Cilla, McDonalds, Sky TV, Tenerife and the like.

Dibble.

Its not often that me and Dibble/PR Mann/The Insider agree on things but its true. The News of The Screws and the Currant will use any celeb/fashion to infiltrate the feeble minds of the readers. I envisage a headline such as "Posh And Becks Despise The Evils Of The Internet" followed by a crap story about how David put "Posh Spice" into a search engine and loads of horrid porn sites came back. The editorial will run with a story about how poor Brooklyn will cope growing up in a world of filth.

Bollocks I am off to bed.

IMHO,I say fuck 'em. They piss 'n moan about the decline of British industry, and yet our good 'ol smut industry is coming on in leaps and bounds. Which can only increase demand in other industries for items such as toilet tissue, hand cream, and inevitabley and eventually, opticians. I can see the headline now "UK porn industry blinds generation". "15 year old sues Ben Dover". Complete and total bag of wank.

All newspapers = BULLSHIT

Won't read any of them.
Let's face it, even the the supposedly "quality" broadsheets are just full of sheep-mind-control fodder, and rehashed warmed-up gubbins that they need to fill all those pages day-in, day-out.
They're just there to shift units by scaring the readers with propaganda. Life's better off without them (or the "news") believe you me. Anything important you get to hear about without reading papers or watching over-extended biased news reports.
Politicians = self-serving scum, newspapers = biased suck-up nonsense. I'll live my life without their influence thanks....

I noticed how upset they were about Desmonds contribution to the Labour Party, saying that it was 'dirty money' and the Government shouldn't accept it. On the other hand I don't see them saying that they shouldn't take my 40% tax for the same reason! Proof if it were needed that we do indeed live, not in a democracy, but a hypocrisy.

....time to move abroad, then, Ben! But it's not even 'dirty money' is it? Now I'm going to sound like our old friend DS here, but nobody forces anybody to buy from the top shelf, and it's not illegal to publish mags. such as Desmonds, so I don't see the problem here at all. Oh, hang on.......it's those Middle Classes again, telling us what's good for us. Unfortunately, nobody believes them any more.