egafd.com

PT means she was originally named, then once she appeared in court, she couldn,t be named, I picked up on that, quite bizzare british justice, I bet she goes down (as it were)

I got upto 'court' when reading his post. The rest was.........well, I don't know what it was.

I agree about the woman though. Some poor cunt could either be sent down unjustly, or a victim may not get the justice they deserved because of a stupid idiot who thought laying a few songs was more important.

Silly cow.

Yeah and I got accused of bringing a spurious racial element into it! by someone who doesn,t even know what race I am! had fuck all to do with that, I was merely making the point about paying attention to such a serious job..

Your always at the harpic..

I think Lizard meant that if it was a case that affected the woman on a more personal level, or something she'd gain from, she'd have taken more notice.

Sam Slater wrote:

> I think Lizard meant that if it was a case that affected the
> woman on a more personal level, or something she'd gain from,
> she'd have taken more notice.
>
>

Thanks for explaining that so succinctly Sam, keith knows what I mean though, if only he'd lay of the cillit bang.

No! because it would never have occured would it.

fact. the girls is asian-muslim
fact. there is little chance of a white girl claiming racial harresment
fact. she is plainly not white c of e
fact. she's a moron, she was a juror in a murder trial, her vote or lack of it, could sway a verdict, you cant listen to evidence if your listening to songs on an ipod.
Any Clearer for you?

I pointed out about a racial claims case, because clearly the girl in question is 100% more likely to be involved in one than you for instance, unless you were the person she was claiming racial harresmant from.