O/T Chris Langham: TV Licence?

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
Lizard
Posts: 6228
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: O/T Chris Langham: TV Licence?

Post by Lizard »

I have never heard of him, but looking on google I thought he had been charged with underage sex!! what does the downloading porn have to do with this case?

[_]> No Liberals were harmed during the making of this post.
Lizard
Posts: 6228
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: O/T Chris Langham: TV Licence?

Post by Lizard »

Oh right, so same case several charges? still never heard of the cunt. Is he funny?

[_]> No Liberals were harmed during the making of this post.
colonel
Posts: 4156
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: O/T Chris Langham: TV Licence?

Post by colonel »

Lizard admits to being pissed...

With photo-taker, it looks like it was fed through a bad SerboCroat- English translation program.
Trumpton
Posts: 7649
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: O/T Chris Langham: TV Licence?

Post by Trumpton »

But you have to admit it's one of photo-taker's more lucid postings - who said ramblings?

Lizard
Posts: 6228
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: O/T Chris Langham: TV Licence?

Post by Lizard »

IT was Jenna Jameson fault gov..

[_]> No Liberals were harmed during the making of this post.
Kramer
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: O/T Chris Langham: TV Licence?

Post by Kramer »

Really Dissapointed in Langham, I was a fan of his comedy and have his brilliant "People Like Us" series on dvd (perhaps I'll have to take it to the charity shop now). I dunno how Townsend got away with it unscathed (saw the Who play Glastonbury and he was just as worshipped as ever). It's horrible when your heroes turn out to be scruffy Peados, I guess I now know how Glitters fans felt after his visit to PC World.
planeterotica
Posts: 7093
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: O/T Chris Langham: TV Licence?

Post by planeterotica »

Comedian Paul Whitehouse gave evidence the other day and according to reports his evidence wasnt very helpfull towards Langham , when Whitehouse was asked if he could see any reason to visit these websites to do research into the series that they were both in he replied that he could see no reason whatsoever for this research and he failed to see where it would have added anything to the series , so it dosnt look as though the research angle is going to do Langham any good !thumbsdown!



Locked