Re: Henman retires.
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 7:33 am
Flat_Eric wrote:
> I take your point though - he was always good, but not quite
> good enough. He was never realistically going to win Wimbledon.
> I always felt he just lacked that extra edge in aggression and
> determination that a player needs to win Slams.
I normally have a big problem with mediocrities who are rewarded for
their only-average talent. But by no measure could TH be described as
mediocre, so good luck to him.
> I take your point though - he was always good, but not quite
> good enough. He was never realistically going to win Wimbledon.
> I always felt he just lacked that extra edge in aggression and
> determination that a player needs to win Slams.
I normally have a big problem with mediocrities who are rewarded for
their only-average talent. But by no measure could TH be described as
mediocre, so good luck to him.