Re: Fining the johns.
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 2:16 pm
warren zevon rip wrote:
>
> He started a "send WZR to Coventry" thread, spewing out the
> abuse that I was quick enough to cut and paste, as proof of his
> true nature. It was virtually identical to Keith's "send WZR to
> Coventry" thread, and both were quickly deleted. I would have
> preferred them to both stand as evidence of his unprovoked
> attack on a fellow forumite.
Ah, I see.
>
> Since he was outed by Dibble and myself as Keith under another
> username, "Giles" seems to have shut up.
That would explain a lot.
>
> I would be interested to know, why "Giles" was not officially
> (or even unofficially - cheers guys!) reprimanded for his abuse
> to me in the same way as "Keith" was for his abuse to Red. I
> know he did not swear, but as you can see from my sig. he was
> being incredibly intimidatory. Fair enough, WZR can always take
> it, but then so could Red.
Is it because you are not a lady?
>
> He started a "send WZR to Coventry" thread, spewing out the
> abuse that I was quick enough to cut and paste, as proof of his
> true nature. It was virtually identical to Keith's "send WZR to
> Coventry" thread, and both were quickly deleted. I would have
> preferred them to both stand as evidence of his unprovoked
> attack on a fellow forumite.
Ah, I see.
>
> Since he was outed by Dibble and myself as Keith under another
> username, "Giles" seems to have shut up.
That would explain a lot.
>
> I would be interested to know, why "Giles" was not officially
> (or even unofficially - cheers guys!) reprimanded for his abuse
> to me in the same way as "Keith" was for his abuse to Red. I
> know he did not swear, but as you can see from my sig. he was
> being incredibly intimidatory. Fair enough, WZR can always take
> it, but then so could Red.
Is it because you are not a lady?